Studi Komparatif Terhadap Makna Itab Kepada Nabi Muhammad Dalam Perspektif Sayyid Quthub dan Buya Hamka

Farid Fauzi, Risman Bustamam, Edriagus Saputra
{"title":"Studi Komparatif Terhadap Makna Itab Kepada Nabi Muhammad Dalam Perspektif Sayyid Quthub dan Buya Hamka","authors":"Farid Fauzi, Risman Bustamam, Edriagus Saputra","doi":"10.15548/ju.v11i1.3535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Itab is a term used to commemorate and reprimand the Prophet Muhammad when he made a mistake, but in the interpretation of Fiy Zhilalil Qur'an by Sayyid Al-Quthb and Tafsir Al-Azhar by Buya Hamka, they differ in interpreting the word itab contained in the verses. Al-Qur'an. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in interpreting the word itab contained in the Qur'an and in this study the author focuses on the verses that explain the sour face and turn away and forbid something that is lawful. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research model and compares the interpretations of Sayyid Qutb and Buya Hamka. From the results of this study which discusses Itab to the Prophet Muhammad SAW, that the two interpreters differ in explaining the meaning of Itab: in terms of language, Sayyid Qutb divides it into 2 types, namely Hard and Soft, while Buya Hamka only has 1 type, namely soft. In terms of terms, Sayyid Qutb uses 2 terms, namely itab and tazdkirah (warning), while buya Hamka uses the terms itab, warning and reprimand. In terms of his position, Sayyid Qutb said that this was a warning to the Prophet Muhammad because of his mistake in ijtihad, so that it had an impact on Islamic law, while according to Buya Hamka, the error of the Prophet Muhammad in ijtihad had no impact on Islamic law, because the Prophet SAW could not be separated from the side of the Prophet Muhammad. mistakes as ordinary people. According to Sayyid Qutb, not all Itabs were addressed to the Prophet Muhammad, but some were addressed to Muslims, while according to Buya Hamka, the Itabs were only addressed to the Prophet Muhammad.","PeriodicalId":138175,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ulunnuha","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ulunnuha","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15548/ju.v11i1.3535","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Itab is a term used to commemorate and reprimand the Prophet Muhammad when he made a mistake, but in the interpretation of Fiy Zhilalil Qur'an by Sayyid Al-Quthb and Tafsir Al-Azhar by Buya Hamka, they differ in interpreting the word itab contained in the verses. Al-Qur'an. The purpose of this study is to analyze the differences in interpreting the word itab contained in the Qur'an and in this study the author focuses on the verses that explain the sour face and turn away and forbid something that is lawful. This study uses a qualitative method with a library research model and compares the interpretations of Sayyid Qutb and Buya Hamka. From the results of this study which discusses Itab to the Prophet Muhammad SAW, that the two interpreters differ in explaining the meaning of Itab: in terms of language, Sayyid Qutb divides it into 2 types, namely Hard and Soft, while Buya Hamka only has 1 type, namely soft. In terms of terms, Sayyid Qutb uses 2 terms, namely itab and tazdkirah (warning), while buya Hamka uses the terms itab, warning and reprimand. In terms of his position, Sayyid Qutb said that this was a warning to the Prophet Muhammad because of his mistake in ijtihad, so that it had an impact on Islamic law, while according to Buya Hamka, the error of the Prophet Muhammad in ijtihad had no impact on Islamic law, because the Prophet SAW could not be separated from the side of the Prophet Muhammad. mistakes as ordinary people. According to Sayyid Qutb, not all Itabs were addressed to the Prophet Muhammad, but some were addressed to Muslims, while according to Buya Hamka, the Itabs were only addressed to the Prophet Muhammad.
先知穆罕默德从赛义德·库萨德·库萨德和布亚·哈卡的角度对伊塔布意义进行了比较研究
伊塔布(Itab)是用来纪念和谴责先知穆罕默德(Prophet Muhammad)犯错误的一个词,但在赛义德·库特布(Sayyid Al-Quthb)和布亚·哈姆卡(Buya Hamka)对Fiy Zhilalil《古兰经》的解释中,他们对经文中包含的伊塔布(Itab)一词的解释不同。Al-Qur国安。本研究的目的是分析古兰经中对“伊塔布”一词的不同解释,在本研究中,作者将重点放在解释酸脸、转身和禁止合法事物的经文上。本研究采用图书馆研究模型的定性方法,比较了库特布和哈姆卡的诠释。从本研究讨论伊塔布到先知穆罕默德SAW的结果来看,两位诠释者对伊塔布意义的解释存在差异:在语言方面,Sayyid Qutb将其分为两种类型,即Hard和Soft,而Buya Hamka只有1种类型,即Soft。在术语方面,Sayyid Qutb使用了两个术语,即itab和tazdkirah(警告),而buya Hamka使用了itab,警告和谴责。就他的立场而言,Sayyid Qutb说,这是对先知穆罕默德的警告,因为他在伊智提哈德的错误,所以它对伊斯兰法律产生了影响,而根据Buya Hamka,先知穆罕默德在伊智提哈德的错误对伊斯兰法律没有影响,因为先知SAW不能与先知穆罕默德的一边分开。像普通人一样犯错。根据Sayyid Qutb的说法,并非所有的伊塔卜都是写给先知穆罕默德的,但有些是写给穆斯林的,而根据Buya Hamka的说法,伊塔卜只写给先知穆罕默德。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信