Selection and Description Bias in Protest Reporting by Government and News Media on Weibo

Han Zhang, Yao Lu, Rui Bai
{"title":"Selection and Description Bias in Protest Reporting by Government and News Media on Weibo","authors":"Han Zhang, Yao Lu, Rui Bai","doi":"10.1017/s0305741023001042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Extensive research in Western societies has demonstrated that media reports of protests have succumbed to selection and description biases, but such tendencies have not yet been tested in the Chinese context. This article investigates the Chinese government and news media's selection and description bias in domestic protest events reporting. Using a large protest event data set from Weibo (CASM-China), we found that government accounts on Weibo covered only 0.4 per cent of protests while news media accounts covered 6.3 per cent of them. In selecting events for coverage, the news media accounts tacitly struck a balance between newsworthiness and political sensitivity; this led them to gravitate towards protests by underprivileged social groups and shy away from protests targeting the government. Government accounts on Weibo, on the other hand, eschewed reporting on violent protests and those organized by the urban middle class and veterans. In reporting selected protest events, both government and news media accounts tended to depoliticize protest events and to frame them in a more positive tone. This description bias was more pronounced for the government than the news media accounts. The government coverage of protest events also had a more thematic (as opposed to episodic) orientation than the news media.","PeriodicalId":223807,"journal":{"name":"The China Quarterly","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The China Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305741023001042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Extensive research in Western societies has demonstrated that media reports of protests have succumbed to selection and description biases, but such tendencies have not yet been tested in the Chinese context. This article investigates the Chinese government and news media's selection and description bias in domestic protest events reporting. Using a large protest event data set from Weibo (CASM-China), we found that government accounts on Weibo covered only 0.4 per cent of protests while news media accounts covered 6.3 per cent of them. In selecting events for coverage, the news media accounts tacitly struck a balance between newsworthiness and political sensitivity; this led them to gravitate towards protests by underprivileged social groups and shy away from protests targeting the government. Government accounts on Weibo, on the other hand, eschewed reporting on violent protests and those organized by the urban middle class and veterans. In reporting selected protest events, both government and news media accounts tended to depoliticize protest events and to frame them in a more positive tone. This description bias was more pronounced for the government than the news media accounts. The government coverage of protest events also had a more thematic (as opposed to episodic) orientation than the news media.
政府与新闻媒体微博抗议报道中的选择与描述偏差
西方社会的广泛研究表明,媒体对抗议活动的报道已经屈服于选择和描述偏见,但这种倾向尚未在中国背景下得到检验。本文考察了中国政府和新闻媒体在国内抗议事件报道中的选择和描述偏差。使用来自微博的大型抗议事件数据集(CASM-China),我们发现微博上的政府账户只覆盖了0.4%的抗议活动,而新闻媒体账户覆盖了6.3%。在选择报道事件时,新闻媒体在新闻价值和政治敏感性之间心照不宣地取得了平衡;这导致他们倾向于弱势社会群体的抗议,而回避针对政府的抗议。另一方面,微博上的政府账号避免报道暴力抗议活动以及由城市中产阶级和退伍军人组织的抗议活动。在报道选定的抗议事件时,政府和新闻媒体的报道都倾向于将抗议事件非政治化,并以更积极的语气来描述它们。与新闻媒体的报道相比,政府的这种描述偏见更为明显。与新闻媒体相比,政府对抗议事件的报道也更具主题性(而非偶发性)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信