A Comprehensive Microbial Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulations using State-of-The-Art Molecular Methods: Three Western-Canadian Case Studies

Marc A. Demeter, V. Wornstaff, C. Wiggins, D. Maley
{"title":"A Comprehensive Microbial Assessment of Hydraulic Fracturing Stimulations using State-of-The-Art Molecular Methods: Three Western-Canadian Case Studies","authors":"Marc A. Demeter, V. Wornstaff, C. Wiggins, D. Maley","doi":"10.2118/195995-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Experience has shown that hydraulic fracturing operations can introduce and/or stimulate microbial populations in the wellbore that in turn may lead to undesired corrosion, souring or other production issues. Biocides are applied to prevent the establishment of problematic microbes. Characterizing and quantifying which microbes will be introduced to a well using molecular techniques allows for optimized or even proactive treatment and prevention strategies to be implemented, whereas, traditional microbial testing methods have proven insufficient.\n Once the standard for microbial assessments in the oil and gas industry, culture media bottles are now just one of many available tests. Tests vary by their resolution (culturable, active and living, total microbes), and the information they yield. Some tests target very specific microbial subgroups of concern (culture media, qPCR), while others evaluate all microbes within the sample (ATP, qPCR, 16S rRNA sequencing). In the case studies presented, water and produced fluids were collected from all pertinent frac sample points (source waters, pre- and post-chem and post completions) and were assessed using the suite of microbial methods stated above.\n Three case studies are presented with several noteworthy observations regarding the value microbial tests provide to frac operations. First, culture media-based testing consistently resulted in incoherent and confusing data that failed to correlate with the remaining testing technologies. Second, ATP technology provided efficient and timely testing which lent itself well to on-site, evidence-based decision making. During one of the fracs, ATP results were used to modify and optimize a microbial control program on-the-fly. Third, DNA-based testing (qPCR and 16S rRNA sequencing) provided the most comprehensive insight into the microbial communities exposed to the well, and those that established post-completions.\n Overall, holistic microbial testing offers the user key information required to design and implement successful microbial control programs for frac. Without it, microbial issues plagued production efforts. Culture media tests provided limited and unreliable information and were deemed not suitable for frac operations. ATP provided a useful microbial load in real-time but could not elucidate the types of microbes present. DNA testing filled this gap by providing quantities and types of microbes present.\n Apart from assessing microbial control programs during the frac, monitoring the production fluids is essential to assuring continued well performance. The acknowledgment of the role microbes play in well completions, and the testing technology to evaluate oilfield microbes is rapidly advancing. Here we present some of the first case studies highlighting the use of molecular, DNA-based technology for assessing hydraulic fracturing operations and showing the fallacy of culture media-based testing which is the current industry standard.","PeriodicalId":325107,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195995-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Experience has shown that hydraulic fracturing operations can introduce and/or stimulate microbial populations in the wellbore that in turn may lead to undesired corrosion, souring or other production issues. Biocides are applied to prevent the establishment of problematic microbes. Characterizing and quantifying which microbes will be introduced to a well using molecular techniques allows for optimized or even proactive treatment and prevention strategies to be implemented, whereas, traditional microbial testing methods have proven insufficient. Once the standard for microbial assessments in the oil and gas industry, culture media bottles are now just one of many available tests. Tests vary by their resolution (culturable, active and living, total microbes), and the information they yield. Some tests target very specific microbial subgroups of concern (culture media, qPCR), while others evaluate all microbes within the sample (ATP, qPCR, 16S rRNA sequencing). In the case studies presented, water and produced fluids were collected from all pertinent frac sample points (source waters, pre- and post-chem and post completions) and were assessed using the suite of microbial methods stated above. Three case studies are presented with several noteworthy observations regarding the value microbial tests provide to frac operations. First, culture media-based testing consistently resulted in incoherent and confusing data that failed to correlate with the remaining testing technologies. Second, ATP technology provided efficient and timely testing which lent itself well to on-site, evidence-based decision making. During one of the fracs, ATP results were used to modify and optimize a microbial control program on-the-fly. Third, DNA-based testing (qPCR and 16S rRNA sequencing) provided the most comprehensive insight into the microbial communities exposed to the well, and those that established post-completions. Overall, holistic microbial testing offers the user key information required to design and implement successful microbial control programs for frac. Without it, microbial issues plagued production efforts. Culture media tests provided limited and unreliable information and were deemed not suitable for frac operations. ATP provided a useful microbial load in real-time but could not elucidate the types of microbes present. DNA testing filled this gap by providing quantities and types of microbes present. Apart from assessing microbial control programs during the frac, monitoring the production fluids is essential to assuring continued well performance. The acknowledgment of the role microbes play in well completions, and the testing technology to evaluate oilfield microbes is rapidly advancing. Here we present some of the first case studies highlighting the use of molecular, DNA-based technology for assessing hydraulic fracturing operations and showing the fallacy of culture media-based testing which is the current industry standard.
利用最先进的分子方法对水力压裂增产措施进行微生物综合评估:加拿大西部的三个案例研究
经验表明,水力压裂作业可能会在井筒中引入和/或刺激微生物种群,进而可能导致不希望的腐蚀、酸化或其他生产问题。使用杀菌剂是为了防止问题微生物的滋生。利用分子技术表征和量化哪些微生物将被引入井中,可以优化甚至实施主动的治疗和预防策略,而传统的微生物测试方法已被证明是不够的。培养基瓶曾经是石油和天然气行业微生物评估的标准,现在只是众多可用测试中的一种。测试因其分辨率(可培养的、活性的和活的、总微生物)和它们产生的信息而异。一些测试针对非常特定的微生物亚群(培养基,qPCR),而其他测试评估样品中的所有微生物(ATP, qPCR, 16S rRNA测序)。在上述案例研究中,从所有相关压裂样点(源水、化学前、化学后和完井后)收集了水和产出液,并使用上述一套微生物方法进行了评估。本文提出了三个案例研究,并对微生物测试为压裂作业提供的价值进行了一些值得注意的观察。首先,基于文化媒介的测试始终导致不连贯和混乱的数据,无法与剩余的测试技术相关联。其次,ATP技术提供了高效、及时的测试,有利于现场循证决策。在其中一次压裂过程中,利用ATP结果实时修改和优化微生物控制程序。第三,基于dna的检测(qPCR和16S rRNA测序)提供了对暴露于井中的微生物群落以及完井后形成的微生物群落的最全面的了解。总体而言,整体微生物测试为用户提供了设计和实施成功的压裂微生物控制方案所需的关键信息。没有它,微生物问题就会困扰生产工作。培养基测试提供的信息有限且不可靠,被认为不适合压裂作业。ATP提供了一个有用的实时微生物负荷,但不能阐明存在的微生物类型。DNA测试通过提供存在的微生物的数量和类型填补了这一空白。除了评估压裂过程中的微生物控制方案外,监测生产流体对于确保井的持续性能至关重要。微生物在完井中的作用和油田微生物评价的测试技术正在迅速发展。在这里,我们介绍了一些第一批案例研究,重点介绍了分子、dna技术在评估水力压裂作业中的应用,并展示了目前行业标准中基于培养基测试的谬误。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信