Fenomenologi Islamisme dan Terorisme

Ridwan Rosdiawan
{"title":"Fenomenologi Islamisme dan Terorisme","authors":"Ridwan Rosdiawan","doi":"10.15642/ad.2018.8.1.194-225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: There are three mainstream theories which elucidate the relationship between Islamic doctrine and political actions that lead to terrorism acts of its believers: Firstly: they who believe that justification of violence and terror acts is inherent products of religious doctrine. Secondly: those who view that terrorism is profane matters, unrelated to religious doctrine whatsoever. Thirdly, opinion that state that terrorism is syncretism as well as interrelative modification between politics and religion. Although the three theories differ in concluding the role of religion in terrorism, they share some analytical approach, which put religion as doctrine and politics as political drive in every terrorism act. To measure the more dominant motive of the two can be done using two perspectives of phenomenology. First perspective views islamist movement as a form of anti modernism which emerges as a cure for western-type of modernization. The west is the enemy. Second perspective concludes that the movement is phenomenon of manifestation as well as response to post-modern development. Islamism emerges as something different, echoing cultural autonomy, alternative political entity as well as moral ideological critique of secularism brought by modernism.     \nKey words: Islamism, terrorism, phenomenology","PeriodicalId":441184,"journal":{"name":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum dan Perundangan Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/ad.2018.8.1.194-225","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: There are three mainstream theories which elucidate the relationship between Islamic doctrine and political actions that lead to terrorism acts of its believers: Firstly: they who believe that justification of violence and terror acts is inherent products of religious doctrine. Secondly: those who view that terrorism is profane matters, unrelated to religious doctrine whatsoever. Thirdly, opinion that state that terrorism is syncretism as well as interrelative modification between politics and religion. Although the three theories differ in concluding the role of religion in terrorism, they share some analytical approach, which put religion as doctrine and politics as political drive in every terrorism act. To measure the more dominant motive of the two can be done using two perspectives of phenomenology. First perspective views islamist movement as a form of anti modernism which emerges as a cure for western-type of modernization. The west is the enemy. Second perspective concludes that the movement is phenomenon of manifestation as well as response to post-modern development. Islamism emerges as something different, echoing cultural autonomy, alternative political entity as well as moral ideological critique of secularism brought by modernism.     Key words: Islamism, terrorism, phenomenology
伊斯兰主义和恐怖主义的现象学
摘要:关于伊斯兰教义与导致其信徒恐怖主义行为的政治行为之间的关系,目前有三种主流理论:第一种是认为暴力和恐怖行为的正当性是宗教教义的固有产物。第二,那些认为恐怖主义是亵渎神明的人,与宗教教义无关。第三,认为恐怖主义是政治与宗教之间的融合和相互关联的修正的观点。虽然这三种理论在总结宗教在恐怖主义中的作用方面有所不同,但它们都有一些共同的分析方法,即在每一次恐怖主义行为中都把宗教作为教义,把政治作为政治驱动力。要衡量两者中更主要的动机,可以使用现象学的两个视角。第一种观点认为伊斯兰运动是一种反现代主义的形式,它是西方现代化的一种治疗方法。西方是敌人。第二种观点认为,这一运动是一种表现现象,也是对后现代发展的回应。伊斯兰主义是作为一种不同的东西出现的,它呼应了现代主义带来的文化自治、另类政治实体以及对世俗主义的道德意识形态批判。关键词:伊斯兰主义,恐怖主义,现象学
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信