Expectations and Reality of International Dispute Resolution

M. N. Islami
{"title":"Expectations and Reality of International Dispute Resolution","authors":"M. N. Islami","doi":"10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"If we look at the provisions contained in the United Nations (especially in its preamble), it will appear that the purpose of the establishment of the United Nations is international peace and security because the United Nations was indeed formed with the background of World War I and II. In contrast, if we pay attention to the provisions of the International Humanitarian Law, the war cannot be prevented. Instead, efforts are made to humanize war. Based on the research, it turns out that the United Nations is not a neutral organization. The United Nations is a political organization run by superpowers, especially The Big Five (United States, Soviet Union, England, France and China). These five countries have veto rights and other advantages so that in international dispute resolution, it often affects the final decisions. Some decisions from ad Hoc Courts, for example, are influenced by these big countries, such as the case of Saddam Hussein. Likewise, the US policy towards cases between Israel and Palestine and terrorism is also evident. Accordingly, this normative research with a case study approach was conducted by taking samples from popular cases in international political issues. The combination of analysis from international provisions with the facts should push the analysis to be more objective.Keywords: International dispute resolution, United Nations","PeriodicalId":280058,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Dinamika Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20884/1.jdh.2022.22.2.3222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

If we look at the provisions contained in the United Nations (especially in its preamble), it will appear that the purpose of the establishment of the United Nations is international peace and security because the United Nations was indeed formed with the background of World War I and II. In contrast, if we pay attention to the provisions of the International Humanitarian Law, the war cannot be prevented. Instead, efforts are made to humanize war. Based on the research, it turns out that the United Nations is not a neutral organization. The United Nations is a political organization run by superpowers, especially The Big Five (United States, Soviet Union, England, France and China). These five countries have veto rights and other advantages so that in international dispute resolution, it often affects the final decisions. Some decisions from ad Hoc Courts, for example, are influenced by these big countries, such as the case of Saddam Hussein. Likewise, the US policy towards cases between Israel and Palestine and terrorism is also evident. Accordingly, this normative research with a case study approach was conducted by taking samples from popular cases in international political issues. The combination of analysis from international provisions with the facts should push the analysis to be more objective.Keywords: International dispute resolution, United Nations
国际争端解决的期望与现实
如果我们看一看《联合国》(特别是其序言部分)所载的各项规定,就会发现成立联合国的目的似乎是国际和平与安全,因为联合国确实是在第一次和第二次世界大战的背景下成立的。相反,如果我们注意国际人道主义法的规定,战争是无法阻止的。相反,人们努力使战争人性化。根据研究,联合国并不是一个中立的组织。联合国是一个由超级大国管理的政治组织,尤其是五大国(美国、苏联、英国、法国和中国)。这五个国家拥有否决权等优势,因此在国际争端解决中,往往会影响到最终的裁决。例如,特设法庭的一些判决就受到这些大国的影响,比如萨达姆·侯赛因案。同样,美国对巴以关系和恐怖主义的政策也是显而易见的。因此,本规范研究采用个案研究方法,从国际政治问题的流行案例中抽取样本。将国际规定的分析与事实相结合,应使分析更加客观。关键词:国际争端解决;联合国
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信