Bayesian technique framework for allocating demand risk between the public and private sector in PPP projects

Bing Li, Z. Ren
{"title":"Bayesian technique framework for allocating demand risk between the public and private sector in PPP projects","authors":"Bing Li, Z. Ren","doi":"10.1109/ICSSSM.2009.5174997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During a PPP (Public Private Partnership) project procurement, the private contractors priced the risk metrics and further negotiation has to be carried out until bother parties finally reach an agreement and sign the contract. The negotiations should consider whether the public sector should either accept the high risk cost, share the risks with the public sector, or retain the risk in the public sector. In the negotiation process, the decision of risk sharing is one of the most difficult task. When one party receives an offer (or counteroffer) from its opponent, he will analyses the offer, modifies its beliefs about the opponent and makes a counteroffer accordingly. The updated belief then becomes the agent's prior knowledge in the next updating process. An agent can finally get a relatively accurate belief about the opponent even if its initial domain knowledge is not so accurate. Both sides information is becoming clear once the negotiation goes further deeper. This paper adopted Bayesian updating techniques to provide a method for a new approach of risk allocation, which focusing how to distribute risk management responsibility between the public client and private contractor.","PeriodicalId":287881,"journal":{"name":"2009 6th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 6th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSSSM.2009.5174997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

During a PPP (Public Private Partnership) project procurement, the private contractors priced the risk metrics and further negotiation has to be carried out until bother parties finally reach an agreement and sign the contract. The negotiations should consider whether the public sector should either accept the high risk cost, share the risks with the public sector, or retain the risk in the public sector. In the negotiation process, the decision of risk sharing is one of the most difficult task. When one party receives an offer (or counteroffer) from its opponent, he will analyses the offer, modifies its beliefs about the opponent and makes a counteroffer accordingly. The updated belief then becomes the agent's prior knowledge in the next updating process. An agent can finally get a relatively accurate belief about the opponent even if its initial domain knowledge is not so accurate. Both sides information is becoming clear once the negotiation goes further deeper. This paper adopted Bayesian updating techniques to provide a method for a new approach of risk allocation, which focusing how to distribute risk management responsibility between the public client and private contractor.
PPP项目中公共和私营部门需求风险分配的贝叶斯技术框架
在PPP(公私合作)项目采购过程中,私人承包商对风险指标进行定价,并进行进一步的谈判,直到各方最终达成协议并签署合同。谈判应考虑公共部门是接受高风险成本,还是与公共部门共同承担风险,还是将风险保留在公共部门。在谈判过程中,风险分担的决策是最困难的任务之一。当一方收到对方的要约(或还盘)时,他会分析该要约,改变对对方的看法,并做出相应的还盘。更新后的信念在下一次更新过程中成为agent的先验知识。一个智能体最终可以得到一个相对准确的关于对手的信念,即使它最初的领域知识不是那么准确。随着谈判的深入,双方的信息也越来越清晰。本文采用贝叶斯更新技术,提出了一种新的风险分配方法,重点研究了如何在公共客户和私人承包商之间分配风险管理责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信