REGULATION IN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT-BASED DESIGN EDUCATION: AN INTERVENTION STUDY MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A GROUP AWARENESS TOOL

Lore Brosens, J. Octavia, A. Raes, M. Emmanouil
{"title":"REGULATION IN COLLABORATIVE PROJECT-BASED DESIGN EDUCATION: AN INTERVENTION STUDY MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A GROUP AWARENESS TOOL","authors":"Lore Brosens, J. Octavia, A. Raes, M. Emmanouil","doi":"10.35199/epde.2020.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fourth industrial revolution is on the horizon and many design engineering jobs of the future are largely unidentified. Tomorrow’s product designers must be able to deal with cutting-edge technology, big data and most importantly to collaborate and react resiliently to changes in the Knowledge Age. Contemporary discourse urges a shift towards multidisciplinary teams in which students must be trained to move from individual to collaborative problem-solving practices. This study examines whether the implementation of a group awareness (GA) tool in a third-year bachelor industrial design engineering course can have a positive impact on learning and teamwork dynamics. The participants of the study (n = 33) were encouraged to take part in group regulating exercises. Students were asked to self-assess the current state of collaboration via a mandatory GA survey, scoring their participation in the group work. After being informed of these results, students were asked to reflect and pose possible behavioural changes on an individual- and group-level. In addition, students received suggestions on how to collaborate through a mandatory scripted peer critique session in which they identified issues, talked about design decisions and created a common ground for further action. The results of the study indicated that the use of the GA tool enabled students to reflect on the different perspectives team members bring to the group’s project. This paper discusses the possibilities and shortcomings of implementing a group awareness tool in design engineering education and further research on this topic.","PeriodicalId":372294,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2020.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The fourth industrial revolution is on the horizon and many design engineering jobs of the future are largely unidentified. Tomorrow’s product designers must be able to deal with cutting-edge technology, big data and most importantly to collaborate and react resiliently to changes in the Knowledge Age. Contemporary discourse urges a shift towards multidisciplinary teams in which students must be trained to move from individual to collaborative problem-solving practices. This study examines whether the implementation of a group awareness (GA) tool in a third-year bachelor industrial design engineering course can have a positive impact on learning and teamwork dynamics. The participants of the study (n = 33) were encouraged to take part in group regulating exercises. Students were asked to self-assess the current state of collaboration via a mandatory GA survey, scoring their participation in the group work. After being informed of these results, students were asked to reflect and pose possible behavioural changes on an individual- and group-level. In addition, students received suggestions on how to collaborate through a mandatory scripted peer critique session in which they identified issues, talked about design decisions and created a common ground for further action. The results of the study indicated that the use of the GA tool enabled students to reflect on the different perspectives team members bring to the group’s project. This paper discusses the possibilities and shortcomings of implementing a group awareness tool in design engineering education and further research on this topic.
基于合作项目的设计教育中的规则:一项测量群体意识工具有效性的干预研究
第四次工业革命即将到来,未来的许多设计工程工作在很大程度上是未知的。未来的产品设计师必须能够处理尖端技术,大数据,最重要的是,协作和灵活应对知识时代的变化。当代话语敦促向多学科团队的转变,其中必须训练学生从个人转向合作解决问题的实践。本研究旨在探讨在本科三年级工业设计工程课程中实施群体意识(GA)工具是否能对学习和团队合作动力产生积极影响。该研究的参与者(n = 33)被鼓励参加小组调节练习。学生们被要求通过一项强制性的GA调查来自我评估当前的合作状态,为他们在小组工作中的参与程度打分。在被告知这些结果后,学生们被要求在个人和群体层面上反思并提出可能的行为改变。此外,学生们还收到了关于如何合作的建议,通过强制性的有脚本的同行评论会议,他们确定了问题,讨论了设计决策,并为进一步的行动创造了共同的基础。研究结果表明,GA工具的使用使学生能够反思团队成员为小组项目带来的不同观点。本文讨论了在设计工程教育中实施群体意识工具的可能性和不足,并对该主题进行了进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信