Trends in Peptide Therapeutics

F. Brunel, Fa Liu, J. Mayer
{"title":"Trends in Peptide Therapeutics","authors":"F. Brunel, Fa Liu, J. Mayer","doi":"10.1002/9783527814695.ch1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The growing importance of peptide drugs within the pharmacopoeia has become evident over the past several decades. Among the factors that have contributed to this trend is the recognition that peptide ligands regulate a multitude of physiological pathways and are often suitable for therapeutic applications, in either their native or modified form. In addition, certain attributes that are unique to peptides, such as their high selectivity, potency, and lack of toxicity, have ultimately become appreciated. The alternative means of drugging peptide receptors through target‐directed screening or rational design of orally available small molecules have, with few exceptions, proved unproductive. Mimicking the activity of a peptide agonist is highly challenging, particularly in the case of Class II G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) targets. Successful examples have typically involved receptor antagonists such as neurokinin, angiotensin, endothelin, and orexin. These lessons have increasingly led drug discovery scientists to consider peptides as legitimate drug candidates, rather than leads or proof‐of‐concept models for small‐molecule programs. Peptide medicinal chemists have also had to confront and overcome shortcomings such as rapid metabolism, clearance, production costs, and limited alternative delivery options. In the present chapter, we highlight the role of peptides in therapeutic areas such as metabolic disease, where peptides have been well established, as well as in areas where their impact has been minor, but now rapidly expanding. We also emphasize examples where time‐extension strategies and alternative delivery routes have helped establish and strengthen the position of peptide drugs in competitive markets. Finally, we explore two novel trends in peptide drug discovery, macrocyclic and cell‐penetrating peptides, both of which may expand future opportunities for peptide therapeutics. Trends in Peptide Therapeutics Florence M. Brunel, Fa Liu, and John P. Mayer","PeriodicalId":362351,"journal":{"name":"Successful Drug Discovery","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Successful Drug Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9783527814695.ch1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The growing importance of peptide drugs within the pharmacopoeia has become evident over the past several decades. Among the factors that have contributed to this trend is the recognition that peptide ligands regulate a multitude of physiological pathways and are often suitable for therapeutic applications, in either their native or modified form. In addition, certain attributes that are unique to peptides, such as their high selectivity, potency, and lack of toxicity, have ultimately become appreciated. The alternative means of drugging peptide receptors through target‐directed screening or rational design of orally available small molecules have, with few exceptions, proved unproductive. Mimicking the activity of a peptide agonist is highly challenging, particularly in the case of Class II G‐protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR) targets. Successful examples have typically involved receptor antagonists such as neurokinin, angiotensin, endothelin, and orexin. These lessons have increasingly led drug discovery scientists to consider peptides as legitimate drug candidates, rather than leads or proof‐of‐concept models for small‐molecule programs. Peptide medicinal chemists have also had to confront and overcome shortcomings such as rapid metabolism, clearance, production costs, and limited alternative delivery options. In the present chapter, we highlight the role of peptides in therapeutic areas such as metabolic disease, where peptides have been well established, as well as in areas where their impact has been minor, but now rapidly expanding. We also emphasize examples where time‐extension strategies and alternative delivery routes have helped establish and strengthen the position of peptide drugs in competitive markets. Finally, we explore two novel trends in peptide drug discovery, macrocyclic and cell‐penetrating peptides, both of which may expand future opportunities for peptide therapeutics. Trends in Peptide Therapeutics Florence M. Brunel, Fa Liu, and John P. Mayer
肽疗法的发展趋势
在过去的几十年里,肽类药物在药典中的重要性越来越明显。促成这一趋势的因素之一是人们认识到肽配体调节多种生理途径,并且通常适合于治疗应用,无论是天然形式还是修饰形式。此外,多肽特有的某些特性,如其高选择性、效力和无毒性,最终得到了人们的重视。除了少数例外,通过靶向筛选或合理设计口服小分子给肽受体用药的替代方法被证明是无效的。模拟肽激动剂的活性是极具挑战性的,特别是在II类G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)靶点的情况下。成功的例子通常涉及受体拮抗剂,如神经激肽、血管紧张素、内皮素和食欲素。这些经验教训越来越多地引导药物发现科学家将多肽视为合法的候选药物,而不是小分子项目的先导或概念证明模型。多肽药物化学家还必须面对和克服诸如快速代谢、清除、生产成本和有限的替代递送选择等缺点。在本章中,我们强调多肽在代谢疾病等治疗领域的作用,在这些领域,多肽已经很好地建立起来,以及在它们的影响较小但现在迅速扩大的领域。我们还强调了一些例子,在这些例子中,延长时间策略和替代递送路线有助于在竞争激烈的市场中建立和加强多肽药物的地位。最后,我们探讨了肽药物发现的两个新趋势,大环肽和细胞穿透肽,这两者都可能扩大肽治疗的未来机会。肽治疗的趋势Florence M. Brunel, Fa Liu, and John P. Mayer
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信