EXPLORING WIDOW REMARRIAGE: A STUDY OF VEDIC INDIA

Rashid Manzoor Bhat, Dr. Lakmini Gamage
{"title":"EXPLORING WIDOW REMARRIAGE: A STUDY OF VEDIC INDIA","authors":"Rashid Manzoor Bhat, Dr. Lakmini Gamage","doi":"10.54443/jaruda.v1i4.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study revisits the contentious issue of widow remarriage in Vedic India through an in-depth analysis of various passages from Vedic texts and different interpretations posited by scholars. The findings suggest that, while it has been historically viewed marriage as an indissoluble sacrament in Hinduism, evidence regarding widow remarriage is not conclusive. Some scholars argue that widow remarriage, specifically to a deceased husband's brother, was practiced during the Vedic era. This assertion is supported by Rigvedic passages X.18.8 and X.40.2, which purportedly hint at the practice. However, this interpretation is disputed, with some arguing that these passages actually underscore practices of self-sacrifice or 'niyoga' (levirate marriage). The study further explores Atharvavedic verses suggesting the remarriage of a punarbhu or a betrothed woman, not a widow. The research therefore suggests that Vedic texts did not explicitly endorse widow remarriage. It argues for a nuanced understanding of ancient customs and societal norms, highlighting the need for more rigorous and context-sensitive interpretations of Vedic texts.","PeriodicalId":284428,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Research, Utility Finance and Digital Assets","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Research, Utility Finance and Digital Assets","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54443/jaruda.v1i4.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study revisits the contentious issue of widow remarriage in Vedic India through an in-depth analysis of various passages from Vedic texts and different interpretations posited by scholars. The findings suggest that, while it has been historically viewed marriage as an indissoluble sacrament in Hinduism, evidence regarding widow remarriage is not conclusive. Some scholars argue that widow remarriage, specifically to a deceased husband's brother, was practiced during the Vedic era. This assertion is supported by Rigvedic passages X.18.8 and X.40.2, which purportedly hint at the practice. However, this interpretation is disputed, with some arguing that these passages actually underscore practices of self-sacrifice or 'niyoga' (levirate marriage). The study further explores Atharvavedic verses suggesting the remarriage of a punarbhu or a betrothed woman, not a widow. The research therefore suggests that Vedic texts did not explicitly endorse widow remarriage. It argues for a nuanced understanding of ancient customs and societal norms, highlighting the need for more rigorous and context-sensitive interpretations of Vedic texts.
探索寡妇再婚:吠陀印度的研究
该研究通过深入分析吠陀经文中的不同段落和学者提出的不同解释,重新审视了吠陀印度寡妇再婚的争议问题。研究结果表明,虽然历史上一直将婚姻视为印度教中不可分割的圣礼,但有关寡妇再婚的证据并不确凿。一些学者认为,寡妇再婚,特别是嫁给已故丈夫的兄弟,是吠陀时代的习俗。这一断言得到梨俱吠陀X.18.8和X.40.2段落的支持,据称暗示了这种做法。然而,这种解释是有争议的,一些人认为这些段落实际上强调了自我牺牲或“niyoga”(利未人的婚姻)的实践。该研究进一步探讨了阿达瓦吠陀的诗句,暗示普纳布夫或订婚的女人再婚,而不是寡妇。因此,研究表明吠陀经文并没有明确支持寡妇再婚。它主张对古代习俗和社会规范进行细致入微的理解,强调需要对吠陀经典进行更严格和上下文敏感的解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信