THE APPLICATION OF PROBLEM POSING MODEL TO IMPROVE CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATHEMATIC LEARNING

D. Larasati, W. Wahyudi, Endang Endarini
{"title":"THE APPLICATION OF PROBLEM POSING MODEL TO IMPROVE CREATIVE THINKING ABILITY IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MATHEMATIC LEARNING","authors":"D. Larasati, W. Wahyudi, Endang Endarini","doi":"10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9812","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creative thinking ability is one of competencies that has to be possesed by all people includes elementary school students. Learning process in class doesn’t give any chances yet to all students to achive this competency. It is one of the causes of the low learning outcomes. The study aims to determine and describe creative thinking ability with problem posing model. The model that is used in this study is Kurt Lewin research model, where the process of action research occurs in a contiunous circle, includes the stages of planning, action, observation and reflection. The subject of this study is students from five grade in Salatiga Public Elementary School Tingkir Tengah 2 totaling 29 students. The technique of data collection used test technique and observation. The data were analyzed with comparative descriptive analysis or comparing result form each cycle. The result of this study showed that creative thinking ability increased on cycle I, 6,91% was on ‘very creative’ criteria, 28,27% was on ‘creative’ criteria, 17,24% was on ‘creative enough’ criteria, 13,79% was on ‘less creative’ category and 13,79% was on ‘not creative’ criteria. On cycle II increased, 44.82% was on ‘very creative’ criteria, 37,97% was on ‘creative’ criteria, 13,79% was on ‘creative enough’ criteria, 3,46% was on ‘less craetive’ criteria and no one was on ‘not creative’ criteria. This improvement on creative thinking ability can have a positive impact toward learning outcomes on cycle I which was 55,17% and on cycle II increased the completeness of 86,20%. With this result, it can be concluded that problem posing model could improve students’ creative thinking ability, so the suggestion that could be given is that learning process using problem posing model should be developed and can be made as one of alternative models in learning process","PeriodicalId":123617,"journal":{"name":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Daya Matematis: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26858/JDS.V7I2.9812","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creative thinking ability is one of competencies that has to be possesed by all people includes elementary school students. Learning process in class doesn’t give any chances yet to all students to achive this competency. It is one of the causes of the low learning outcomes. The study aims to determine and describe creative thinking ability with problem posing model. The model that is used in this study is Kurt Lewin research model, where the process of action research occurs in a contiunous circle, includes the stages of planning, action, observation and reflection. The subject of this study is students from five grade in Salatiga Public Elementary School Tingkir Tengah 2 totaling 29 students. The technique of data collection used test technique and observation. The data were analyzed with comparative descriptive analysis or comparing result form each cycle. The result of this study showed that creative thinking ability increased on cycle I, 6,91% was on ‘very creative’ criteria, 28,27% was on ‘creative’ criteria, 17,24% was on ‘creative enough’ criteria, 13,79% was on ‘less creative’ category and 13,79% was on ‘not creative’ criteria. On cycle II increased, 44.82% was on ‘very creative’ criteria, 37,97% was on ‘creative’ criteria, 13,79% was on ‘creative enough’ criteria, 3,46% was on ‘less craetive’ criteria and no one was on ‘not creative’ criteria. This improvement on creative thinking ability can have a positive impact toward learning outcomes on cycle I which was 55,17% and on cycle II increased the completeness of 86,20%. With this result, it can be concluded that problem posing model could improve students’ creative thinking ability, so the suggestion that could be given is that learning process using problem posing model should be developed and can be made as one of alternative models in learning process
问题提出模式在小学数学学习中提高创造性思维能力的应用
创造性思维能力是包括小学生在内的所有人都必须具备的能力之一。课堂上的学习过程并没有给所有学生提供任何机会来实现这一能力。这是导致学习效果低的原因之一。本研究旨在用问题提出模型来确定和描述创造性思维能力。本研究使用的模型是Kurt Lewin研究模型,其中行动研究的过程是一个连续的循环,包括计划、行动、观察和反思四个阶段。本研究以Salatiga Public Elementary School Tingkir Tengah 2五年级学生为研究对象,共29名学生。数据采集技术采用试验技术和观察法。采用比较描述性分析或各周期比较结果分析。这项研究的结果表明,创造性思维能力在周期1中增加了6,91%是在“非常有创意”的标准上,28.27%是在“有创意”的标准上,17,24%是在“足够有创意”的标准上,13,79%是在“不太有创意”的类别上,13,79%是在“没有创意”的标准上。在第二周期中,44.82%的人处于“非常有创意”的标准,37.97%的人处于“有创意”的标准,13.79%的人处于“足够有创意”的标准,3.46%的人处于“不那么有创意”的标准,没有人处于“没有创意”的标准。这种创造性思维能力的提高对第一阶段的学习成果有55.17%的正向影响,对第二阶段的学习成果有86.20%的正向影响。由此可见,问题提出模式可以提高学生的创造性思维能力,因此建议开发利用问题提出模式的学习过程,并将其作为学习过程中的一种替代模式
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信