The Potential Illegitimacy of the PRC’s Effort to Distinguish from “Cult” or “Destructive Cult”

Xinzhan Zhang
{"title":"The Potential Illegitimacy of the PRC’s Effort to Distinguish from “Cult” or “Destructive Cult”","authors":"Xinzhan Zhang","doi":"10.5840/asrr202011169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The PRC has a systematic, self-consistent theory and set of policies focused on xie jiao (邪教), a term that is often mistranslated as “destructive cults,” thereby causing disagreement throughout the international academic world. A more appropriate and accurate translation/interpretation agreeable to all within the PRC and beyond would contribute to bridging the confusion that often leads to misunderstanding. Our article addresses this problem by analyzing official Chinese documents and the critiques of certain international experts. Although the concept of xie jiao has its own philosophical logic, that it is often misunderstood in international communications leads to much dispute over interpretation and policy. Sino-western cultural differences explain much of this misunderstanding.","PeriodicalId":187018,"journal":{"name":"Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternative Spirituality and Religion Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5840/asrr202011169","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The PRC has a systematic, self-consistent theory and set of policies focused on xie jiao (邪教), a term that is often mistranslated as “destructive cults,” thereby causing disagreement throughout the international academic world. A more appropriate and accurate translation/interpretation agreeable to all within the PRC and beyond would contribute to bridging the confusion that often leads to misunderstanding. Our article addresses this problem by analyzing official Chinese documents and the critiques of certain international experts. Although the concept of xie jiao has its own philosophical logic, that it is often misunderstood in international communications leads to much dispute over interpretation and policy. Sino-western cultural differences explain much of this misunderstanding.
中国试图区分“邪教”或“破坏性邪教”的潜在不正当性
中华人民共和国有一个系统的、自我一致的理论和一套针对邪教的政策,这个术语经常被误译为“破坏性的邪教”,因此在整个国际学术界引起了分歧。一个更合适和准确的翻译/解释,在中国内外都能接受,将有助于弥合经常导致误解的混乱。我们的文章通过分析中国官方文件和某些国际专家的批评来解决这个问题。虽然“谢教”有其自身的哲学逻辑,但由于在国际交往中经常被误解,导致了很多关于解释和政策的争论。中西文化差异在很大程度上解释了这种误解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信