Methods of Assessing Sedentary Behaviour

P. Marconcin, P. Júdice, G. Ferrari, A. O. Werneck, A. Marques
{"title":"Methods of Assessing Sedentary Behaviour","authors":"P. Marconcin, P. Júdice, G. Ferrari, A. O. Werneck, A. Marques","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.99567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Increasing amounts of time spent in sedentary behaviour (SB), during occupation or recreation activities, is considered a global health problem. SB has been associated with several non-communicable diseases and all-cause mortality. Thus, it is essential to assess SB through the most accurate and suitable measurement tools. This chapter presents an overview of different methods for assessing SB and highlights the importance of determining the best measurement tool. In choosing an appropriate and accurate method, it is relevant to consider multiple factors, such as population characteristics, context, validity and reliability of measurement tools, and potential research and participant burdens. Subjective measurements, such as self-reported questionnaires, are widely used in epidemiologic studies because they are easy to administer at low cost. However, there is a large variety of questionnaires, which makes it difficult to select a single questionnaire to assess SB. Device-based measurements are more accurate for assessing SB as well as determining bouts and breaks. Both methods present strengths and limitations, and when possible, researchers should use a combination of device-based and subjective methods to improve SB assessment.","PeriodicalId":156702,"journal":{"name":"Sedentary Behaviour - A Contemporary View","volume":"49 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sedentary Behaviour - A Contemporary View","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Increasing amounts of time spent in sedentary behaviour (SB), during occupation or recreation activities, is considered a global health problem. SB has been associated with several non-communicable diseases and all-cause mortality. Thus, it is essential to assess SB through the most accurate and suitable measurement tools. This chapter presents an overview of different methods for assessing SB and highlights the importance of determining the best measurement tool. In choosing an appropriate and accurate method, it is relevant to consider multiple factors, such as population characteristics, context, validity and reliability of measurement tools, and potential research and participant burdens. Subjective measurements, such as self-reported questionnaires, are widely used in epidemiologic studies because they are easy to administer at low cost. However, there is a large variety of questionnaires, which makes it difficult to select a single questionnaire to assess SB. Device-based measurements are more accurate for assessing SB as well as determining bouts and breaks. Both methods present strengths and limitations, and when possible, researchers should use a combination of device-based and subjective methods to improve SB assessment.
评估久坐行为的方法
在职业或娱乐活动中,久坐行为(SB)时间的增加被认为是一个全球性的健康问题。SB与几种非传染性疾病和全因死亡率有关。因此,必须通过最准确和合适的测量工具来评估SB。本章概述了评估SB的不同方法,并强调了确定最佳测量工具的重要性。在选择合适和准确的方法时,需要考虑多种因素,如人口特征、背景、测量工具的效度和可靠性,以及潜在的研究和参与者负担。主观测量,如自我报告的问卷,在流行病学研究中广泛使用,因为它们易于管理,成本低。然而,问卷的种类繁多,很难选择单一的问卷来评估SB。基于设备的测量对于评估SB以及确定发作和休息更为准确。两种方法都有各自的优点和局限性,在可能的情况下,研究人员应该结合使用基于设备的方法和主观方法来改进SB评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信