Proposing a model of social media user interaction with fake news

Abhijeet Shirsat, Angel F. González, Judith J. May
{"title":"Proposing a model of social media user interaction with fake news","authors":"Abhijeet Shirsat, Angel F. González, Judith J. May","doi":"10.1108/jices-10-2020-0104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to understand the allure and danger of fake news in social media environments and propose a theoretical model of the phenomenon.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis qualitative research study used the uses and gratifications theory (UGT) approach to analyze how and why people used social media during the 2016 US presidential election.\n\n\nFindings\nThe thematic analysis revealed people were gratified after using social media to connect with friends and family and to gather and share information and after using it as a vehicle of expression. Participants found a significant number of fake news stories on social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Participants tried to differentiate between fake news and real news using fact-checking websites and news sources and interacted with the social media users who posted fake news and became part of the echo chamber. Behaviors like these emerged in the analysis that could not be completely explained by UGT and required further exploration which resulted in a model that became the core of this study.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis is a small-scale exploratory study with eight diverse participants, findings should not be generalized to larger populations. Time-specific self-reporting of information from social media and fake news during the 2016 US presidential election. Upgrading public policies related to social media is recommended in the study, contributing to burgeoning policy discussions and provides recommendations for both purveyors of social media and public policymakers.\n\n\nPractical implications\nUpgrade in public policies related to social media is recommended in the study and contributes to burgeoning policy discussions and provides recommendations for both purveyors of social media and public policymakers.\n\n\nSocial implications\nSocial media users are spending increased time on their preferred platforms. This study increases the understanding of the nature, function and transformation of virtual social media environments and their effects on real individuals, cultures and societies.What is original/of value about the paper?This exploratory study establishes the foundation on which to expand research in the area of social media use and fake news.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis exploratory study establishes the foundation to expand research in the area of social media use and fake news.\n","PeriodicalId":156416,"journal":{"name":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Inf. Commun. Ethics Soc.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jices-10-2020-0104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand the allure and danger of fake news in social media environments and propose a theoretical model of the phenomenon. Design/methodology/approach This qualitative research study used the uses and gratifications theory (UGT) approach to analyze how and why people used social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Findings The thematic analysis revealed people were gratified after using social media to connect with friends and family and to gather and share information and after using it as a vehicle of expression. Participants found a significant number of fake news stories on social media during the 2016 US presidential election. Participants tried to differentiate between fake news and real news using fact-checking websites and news sources and interacted with the social media users who posted fake news and became part of the echo chamber. Behaviors like these emerged in the analysis that could not be completely explained by UGT and required further exploration which resulted in a model that became the core of this study. Research limitations/implications This is a small-scale exploratory study with eight diverse participants, findings should not be generalized to larger populations. Time-specific self-reporting of information from social media and fake news during the 2016 US presidential election. Upgrading public policies related to social media is recommended in the study, contributing to burgeoning policy discussions and provides recommendations for both purveyors of social media and public policymakers. Practical implications Upgrade in public policies related to social media is recommended in the study and contributes to burgeoning policy discussions and provides recommendations for both purveyors of social media and public policymakers. Social implications Social media users are spending increased time on their preferred platforms. This study increases the understanding of the nature, function and transformation of virtual social media environments and their effects on real individuals, cultures and societies.What is original/of value about the paper?This exploratory study establishes the foundation on which to expand research in the area of social media use and fake news. Originality/value This exploratory study establishes the foundation to expand research in the area of social media use and fake news.
提出一种社交媒体用户与假新闻互动的模式
本研究旨在了解社交媒体环境下假新闻的诱惑力和危险性,并提出假新闻现象的理论模型。这项定性研究使用使用和满足理论(UGT)方法来分析人们在2016年美国总统大选期间如何以及为什么使用社交媒体。主题分析显示,人们在使用社交媒体与朋友和家人联系,收集和分享信息,并将其作为表达工具后,感到满意。在2016年美国总统大选期间,参与者在社交媒体上发现了大量假新闻。参与者试图通过事实核查网站和新闻来源区分假新闻和真实新闻,并与发布假新闻的社交媒体用户互动,成为回音室的一部分。这些行为在分析中出现,UGT无法完全解释,需要进一步探索,从而形成了一个模型,成为本研究的核心。研究局限性/意义这是一项小规模的探索性研究,有8名不同的参与者,研究结果不应推广到更大的人群。2016年美国总统大选期间,社交媒体和假新闻中特定时间的信息自我报告。该研究建议升级与社交媒体相关的公共政策,有助于迅速发展的政策讨论,并为社交媒体提供者和公共政策制定者提供建议。研究建议提高与社交媒体相关的公共政策的水平,这有助于迅速发展的政策讨论,并为社交媒体的提供者和公共政策制定者提供建议。社交媒体用户在他们喜欢的平台上花费的时间越来越多。本研究增加了对虚拟社交媒体环境的性质、功能和转变及其对现实个人、文化和社会的影响的理解。论文的原创性/价值是什么?本探索性研究为拓展社交媒体使用与假新闻领域的研究奠定了基础。原创性/价值本探索性研究为拓展社交媒体使用与假新闻领域的研究奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信