論莊子「即內聖即外王」的實踐型態

吳肇嘉 吳肇嘉
{"title":"論莊子「即內聖即外王」的實踐型態","authors":"吳肇嘉 吳肇嘉","doi":"10.53106/2306036020210600370007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 歷來的莊子研究,往往著重於「生命哲學」主觀面向,而未意識到其「外王」面的作用。這不但窄化了莊學理論的豐富性,同時也削損其回應時代變化的可能。本文目的,即在發掘莊子外王思想的線索,並探討其作用於人間世的方式。\n 以《莊》書對「有為之治」的批判觀之,莊子將一切存有問題歸因於「心知」之造作,書中所有工夫論述皆是對此而發。由於心知造作遮蔽德性,阻礙生命與外物的自然互動,而牽引外物脫軌亂序。因此問題之解答,即在解消心知造作以恢復德性作用。個體透過「德」的活動而與造化萬物的「道」相接,終而能與存在界達成本然的契合。故莊子的外王,只須無為修養,而不勞典制建構;「即內聖而即外王」一語,就此義可為莊子外王實踐的恰當表述。\n In the past, the understanding of Zhuangzi’s thoughts often focused on the subjective aspects of the \"\"Life Philosophy \"\" without realizing its objective impact on society. This not only limited the richness of his thoughts, but also underestimated its ability to cope with the changes of the times. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to find clues about the “Outward Governance”(外王) in Zhuangzi’s thought, and to explore the ways in which it affects society.\n The exploration starts from the “Root Problem”(「基源問題」) of Zhuangzi. It could be inferred from the acute criticism in the texts against “the interventionist governance”(有為之治) that Zhuangzi obviously blamed every existing problem on “Mind”(心知), and any practice is developed for this. Because the paranoid structure of the Mind suppresses human nature(德)and hinders the natural interaction between life and external things, it causes the whole world to derail and disorder. The answer to this question is to untie the paranoid structure of the mind to restore the role of human nature. Through the spontaneous activities of human nature, the individual is connected with the \"\"Tao\"\"(道)that creates all things, and finally the original fit between the individual and all beings can be realized. Therefore, Zhuangzi’s political practice only requires the cultivation of a \"\"Non-Interference\"\" attitude, not the construction of a specific system. In this sense, the best description of Zhuangzi’s political practice is the phrase \"\"Cultivation itself is politics\"\".\n \n","PeriodicalId":243831,"journal":{"name":"中正漢學研究","volume":"271 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中正漢學研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/2306036020210600370007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

歷來的莊子研究,往往著重於「生命哲學」主觀面向,而未意識到其「外王」面的作用。這不但窄化了莊學理論的豐富性,同時也削損其回應時代變化的可能。本文目的,即在發掘莊子外王思想的線索,並探討其作用於人間世的方式。 以《莊》書對「有為之治」的批判觀之,莊子將一切存有問題歸因於「心知」之造作,書中所有工夫論述皆是對此而發。由於心知造作遮蔽德性,阻礙生命與外物的自然互動,而牽引外物脫軌亂序。因此問題之解答,即在解消心知造作以恢復德性作用。個體透過「德」的活動而與造化萬物的「道」相接,終而能與存在界達成本然的契合。故莊子的外王,只須無為修養,而不勞典制建構;「即內聖而即外王」一語,就此義可為莊子外王實踐的恰當表述。  In the past, the understanding of Zhuangzi’s thoughts often focused on the subjective aspects of the ""Life Philosophy "" without realizing its objective impact on society. This not only limited the richness of his thoughts, but also underestimated its ability to cope with the changes of the times. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to find clues about the “Outward Governance”(外王) in Zhuangzi’s thought, and to explore the ways in which it affects society. The exploration starts from the “Root Problem”(「基源問題」) of Zhuangzi. It could be inferred from the acute criticism in the texts against “the interventionist governance”(有為之治) that Zhuangzi obviously blamed every existing problem on “Mind”(心知), and any practice is developed for this. Because the paranoid structure of the Mind suppresses human nature(德)and hinders the natural interaction between life and external things, it causes the whole world to derail and disorder. The answer to this question is to untie the paranoid structure of the mind to restore the role of human nature. Through the spontaneous activities of human nature, the individual is connected with the ""Tao""(道)that creates all things, and finally the original fit between the individual and all beings can be realized. Therefore, Zhuangzi’s political practice only requires the cultivation of a ""Non-Interference"" attitude, not the construction of a specific system. In this sense, the best description of Zhuangzi’s political practice is the phrase ""Cultivation itself is politics"".  
论庄子「即内圣即外王」的实践型态
历来的庄子研究,往往著重于「生命哲学」主观面向,而未意识到其「外王」面的作用。这不但窄化了庄学理论的丰富性,同时也削损其回应时代变化的可能。本文目的,即在发掘庄子外王思想的线索,并探讨其作用于人间世的方式。 以《庄》书对「有为之治」的批判观之,庄子将一切存有问题归因于「心知」之造作,书中所有工夫论述皆是对此而发。由于心知造作遮蔽德性,阻碍生命与外物的自然互动,而牵引外物脱轨乱序。因此问题之解答,即在解消心知造作以恢复德性作用。个体透过「德」的活动而与造化万物的「道」相接,终而能与存在界达成本然的契合。故庄子的外王,只须无为修养,而不劳典制建构;「即内圣而即外王」一语,就此义可为庄子外王实践的恰当表述。 In the past, the understanding of Zhuangzi’s thoughts often focused on the subjective aspects of the ""Life Philosophy "" without realizing its objective impact on society. This not only limited the richness of his thoughts, but also underestimated its ability to cope with the changes of the times. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to find clues about the “Outward Governance”(外王) in Zhuangzi’s thought, and to explore the ways in which it affects society. The exploration starts from the “Root Problem”(「基源问题」) of Zhuangzi. It could be inferred from the acute criticism in the texts against “the interventionist governance”(有为之治) that Zhuangzi obviously blamed every existing problem on “Mind”(心知), and any practice is developed for this. Because the paranoid structure of the Mind suppresses human nature(德)and hinders the natural interaction between life and external things, it causes the whole world to derail and disorder. The answer to this question is to untie the paranoid structure of the mind to restore the role of human nature. Through the spontaneous activities of human nature, the individual is connected with the ""Tao""(道)that creates all things, and finally the original fit between the individual and all beings can be realized. Therefore, Zhuangzi’s political practice only requires the cultivation of a ""Non-Interference"" attitude, not the construction of a specific system. In this sense, the best description of Zhuangzi’s political practice is the phrase ""Cultivation itself is politics"".
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信