Development of Virtual Skill Trainers and Their Validation Study Analysis Using Machine Learning

Seema Shedage, Jake Farmer, Doga Demirel, Tansel Halic, S. Kockara, V. Arikatla, K. Sexton, Shahryar Ahmadi
{"title":"Development of Virtual Skill Trainers and Their Validation Study Analysis Using Machine Learning","authors":"Seema Shedage, Jake Farmer, Doga Demirel, Tansel Halic, S. Kockara, V. Arikatla, K. Sexton, Shahryar Ahmadi","doi":"10.1145/3471287.3471296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Minimally invasive skills assessment is important in developing competent surgical simulators and executing reliable skills evaluation [9]. Arthroscopy and Laparoscopy surgeries are considered Minimally Invasive Surgeries (MIS). In MIS, the surgeon operates through small incisions with specialized narrow instruments, fiberoptic lights, and a monitor. Arthroscopy surgery is used to diagnose and treat joints problems, and Laparoscopic procedures are performed on the abdominal cavity. Due to non-natural hand-eye coordination, narrow field-of-view, and limited instrument control, MIS training is challenging to master. We are analyzing two simulators' data, Virtual Arthroscopic Tear Diagnosis and Evaluation Platform (VATDEP) and Gentleness Simulator. Both simulators went through the validation studies with human subjects. We recorded simulation data during the validation studies, such as tool motion, position, and task time. Recorded data went through the data preprocessing; after the data cleaning, we extracted the recoded data features and normalized them. Normalized features were used to input various machine learning algorithms, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector machine (SVM), and Logistic regression (LR). The average accuracy was evaluated through k-fold cross-validation. The proposed methods validated using 10 subjects (5 experts, 5 novices) for the VATDEP simulator. 23 subjects (4 experts and 19 novices) for the Gentleness Simulator. The result shows a significant difference between the expert and novice population with the p < 0.05 using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The VATDEP simulator's classification algorithms' average accuracy is 74% and 80% for the Gentleness Simulator. The results show that the normalized features and with KNN, SVM, and LR classifiers can provide accurate classification of experts and novices. The evaluation technique proposed in this study can develop surgical training by providing appropriate feedback to trainees to evaluate proficiency.","PeriodicalId":306474,"journal":{"name":"2021 the 5th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 the 5th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3471287.3471296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Minimally invasive skills assessment is important in developing competent surgical simulators and executing reliable skills evaluation [9]. Arthroscopy and Laparoscopy surgeries are considered Minimally Invasive Surgeries (MIS). In MIS, the surgeon operates through small incisions with specialized narrow instruments, fiberoptic lights, and a monitor. Arthroscopy surgery is used to diagnose and treat joints problems, and Laparoscopic procedures are performed on the abdominal cavity. Due to non-natural hand-eye coordination, narrow field-of-view, and limited instrument control, MIS training is challenging to master. We are analyzing two simulators' data, Virtual Arthroscopic Tear Diagnosis and Evaluation Platform (VATDEP) and Gentleness Simulator. Both simulators went through the validation studies with human subjects. We recorded simulation data during the validation studies, such as tool motion, position, and task time. Recorded data went through the data preprocessing; after the data cleaning, we extracted the recoded data features and normalized them. Normalized features were used to input various machine learning algorithms, including K-nearest neighbor (KNN), Support vector machine (SVM), and Logistic regression (LR). The average accuracy was evaluated through k-fold cross-validation. The proposed methods validated using 10 subjects (5 experts, 5 novices) for the VATDEP simulator. 23 subjects (4 experts and 19 novices) for the Gentleness Simulator. The result shows a significant difference between the expert and novice population with the p < 0.05 using the Mann-Whitney U-test. The VATDEP simulator's classification algorithms' average accuracy is 74% and 80% for the Gentleness Simulator. The results show that the normalized features and with KNN, SVM, and LR classifiers can provide accurate classification of experts and novices. The evaluation technique proposed in this study can develop surgical training by providing appropriate feedback to trainees to evaluate proficiency.
基于机器学习的虚拟技能培训师开发及其验证研究分析
微创技能评估对于开发合格的手术模拟器和执行可靠的技能评估非常重要[9]。关节镜和腹腔镜手术被认为是微创手术。在MIS中,外科医生使用专门的狭窄器械、光纤灯和监视器通过小切口进行手术。关节镜手术用于诊断和治疗关节问题,腹腔镜手术在腹腔进行。由于非自然的手眼协调、狭窄的视野和有限的仪器控制,MIS训练是具有挑战性的。我们分析了两个模拟器的数据,虚拟关节镜撕裂诊断和评估平台(VATDEP)和温柔模拟器。这两个模拟器都通过了人类受试者的验证研究。我们在验证研究期间记录了模拟数据,例如工具运动,位置和任务时间。记录的数据经过数据预处理;经过数据清洗后,提取编码后的数据特征并进行归一化处理。使用归一化特征输入各种机器学习算法,包括k -最近邻(KNN),支持向量机(SVM)和逻辑回归(LR)。通过k-fold交叉验证评估平均准确度。采用10名被试(5名专家,5名新手)对VATDEP模拟器进行了验证。温柔模拟器实验对象23人(专家4人,新手19人)。经Mann-Whitney u检验,专家型人群与新手群体差异显著,p < 0.05。VATDEP模拟器的分类算法平均准确率为74%,gentle模拟器的分类算法平均准确率为80%。结果表明,将归一化特征与KNN、SVM和LR分类器相结合,可以为专家和新手提供准确的分类。本研究提出的评估技术,可透过提供适当的反馈,以评估受训者的熟练程度,进而发展外科训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信