Cuidados em saúde na formação farmacêutica: Qualidade percebida pelos egressos

A. S. P. Silva, Paulo Fernandes Saad, Luis Alberto Valotta
{"title":"Cuidados em saúde na formação farmacêutica: Qualidade percebida pelos egressos","authors":"A. S. P. Silva, Paulo Fernandes Saad, Luis Alberto Valotta","doi":"10.4322/rbaval202211039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The National Higher Education Assessment System aims to evaluate Higher Education Institutions, courses and student performance, the latter from the perspective of the National Curriculum Guidelines that, it is hoped, will ensure an egress profile capable of meeting the current needs, a context that demands alumni follow-up processes. Studies involving evaluation by pharmaceutical graduates do not address the current guidelines, representing gaps related to the levels of (dis)satisfaction involved - liable to be determined through the Kano Model, a Quality Management tool. The competencies of the Health Care axis of the current guidelines were evaluated via online questionnaires, sent to 307 pharmacists from a Federal Public University. Complementary questions addressed the access and importance given to competences. Prevalence for competencies classified as Unidimensional (presence generates satisfaction and absence generates dissatisfaction) and with a significant contribution to performance. The strategy, unprecedented for the course, proved to be viable, representing a methodology in tune with formative-emancipatory assessment models.","PeriodicalId":285500,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação","volume":"135 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Avaliação","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/rbaval202211039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The National Higher Education Assessment System aims to evaluate Higher Education Institutions, courses and student performance, the latter from the perspective of the National Curriculum Guidelines that, it is hoped, will ensure an egress profile capable of meeting the current needs, a context that demands alumni follow-up processes. Studies involving evaluation by pharmaceutical graduates do not address the current guidelines, representing gaps related to the levels of (dis)satisfaction involved - liable to be determined through the Kano Model, a Quality Management tool. The competencies of the Health Care axis of the current guidelines were evaluated via online questionnaires, sent to 307 pharmacists from a Federal Public University. Complementary questions addressed the access and importance given to competences. Prevalence for competencies classified as Unidimensional (presence generates satisfaction and absence generates dissatisfaction) and with a significant contribution to performance. The strategy, unprecedented for the course, proved to be viable, representing a methodology in tune with formative-emancipatory assessment models.
药学培训中的医疗保健:毕业生对质量的感知
国家高等教育评估系统旨在评估高等教育机构、课程和学生的表现,后者从国家课程指南的角度进行评估,希望能够确保毕业后的情况能够满足当前的需求,这需要校友的后续工作。涉及药学毕业生评估的研究没有解决当前的指导方针,这代表了与所涉及的(不)满意度水平相关的差距——可以通过质量管理工具Kano模型来确定。通过向联邦公立大学的307名药剂师发送在线问卷,对现行指南的卫生保健轴的能力进行了评估。补充问题涉及对能力的获取和重要性。能力的流行度被分类为单向度(在场产生满意,缺席产生不满意),并且对绩效有重大贡献。这门课程前所未有的战略被证明是可行的,代表了一种与形成解放式评估模式相协调的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信