Statistical indices for software quality estimation

ACM-SE 28 Pub Date : 1990-04-01 DOI:10.1145/98949.99063
Amos O. Olagunju, J. Turner, D. Richey, R. Jackson, S. Hanley, A. Williams, R. Howard
{"title":"Statistical indices for software quality estimation","authors":"Amos O. Olagunju, J. Turner, D. Richey, R. Jackson, S. Hanley, A. Williams, R. Howard","doi":"10.1145/98949.99063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"n major feature is a work package designed to satisfy the processing objectives of a client company. The number of major features always varies from one software release to another C01891. Although there is an increasing trend in the number of major features and enhancement modification requests from one software release to another, the number of maintenance modification requests continues fluctuate; consequently, the total modification requests and items do not always exhibit a stable pattern [01891. In addition to providing information on the quality of discrepancy reports, modification request items, scripts and the overall software, quantitative indices are needed for estimating the discovery rate of discrepancy reports, the defect density of the current software and the field fault density. The primary purpose of this project was to develop statistical indices for estimating the quality of new or updated software releases. This paper presents a set of newly-developed absolute and relative measures that are useful for estimating the quality of software releases. Quality metrics were developed to better support (a) quality assurance estimation for major and minor software releases; and (b) computation of estimated field values such as the field fault density. Uhl ike the existing software quality metrics, (e.g., Li89, MuB7, Hu891, the new sets of quality assurance indices will be found useful by two categories of users — one set for the developers and test organizations, and the other in administrative decision-making positions. Cubic splines, polynomial splines, Langrangian interpolating polynomials and least squares ression analysis are alternative tools","PeriodicalId":409883,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 28","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 28","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/98949.99063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

n major feature is a work package designed to satisfy the processing objectives of a client company. The number of major features always varies from one software release to another C01891. Although there is an increasing trend in the number of major features and enhancement modification requests from one software release to another, the number of maintenance modification requests continues fluctuate; consequently, the total modification requests and items do not always exhibit a stable pattern [01891. In addition to providing information on the quality of discrepancy reports, modification request items, scripts and the overall software, quantitative indices are needed for estimating the discovery rate of discrepancy reports, the defect density of the current software and the field fault density. The primary purpose of this project was to develop statistical indices for estimating the quality of new or updated software releases. This paper presents a set of newly-developed absolute and relative measures that are useful for estimating the quality of software releases. Quality metrics were developed to better support (a) quality assurance estimation for major and minor software releases; and (b) computation of estimated field values such as the field fault density. Uhl ike the existing software quality metrics, (e.g., Li89, MuB7, Hu891, the new sets of quality assurance indices will be found useful by two categories of users — one set for the developers and test organizations, and the other in administrative decision-making positions. Cubic splines, polynomial splines, Langrangian interpolating polynomials and least squares ression analysis are alternative tools
软件质量评估的统计指标
N个主要功能是设计一个工作包,以满足客户公司的处理目标。在不同的软件版本之间,主要特性的数量总是不同的。虽然从一个软件版本到另一个软件版本的主要特性和增强修改请求的数量有增加的趋势,但维护修改请求的数量继续波动;因此,修改请求和项目的总数并不总是呈现稳定的模式[01891]。除了提供差异报告、修改请求项、脚本和整个软件的质量信息外,还需要定量指标来估计差异报告的发现率、当前软件的缺陷密度和现场故障密度。这个项目的主要目的是开发用于估计新的或更新的软件版本的质量的统计指数。本文提出了一套新开发的绝对度量和相对度量,可用于评估软件发布的质量。开发质量量度以更好地支持(a)主要和次要软件版本的质量保证评估;(b)计算场断层密度等估计场值。与现有的软件质量度量标准(例如Li89、MuB7、Hu891)不同,新的质量保证指标集将被两类用户发现有用——一组用于开发人员和测试组织,另一组用于管理决策职位。三次样条、多项式样条、朗朗日插值多项式和最小二乘回归分析是可供选择的工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信