Internet pricing: comparison and examples

Xi-Ren Cao, Hongxia Shen
{"title":"Internet pricing: comparison and examples","authors":"Xi-Ren Cao, Hongxia Shen","doi":"10.1109/CDC.2000.914138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The central issue of Internet economics is pricing. Cao et al. studied the Internet pricing based on the leader-follower game, the cooperative game, and the two-person game theory. In this paper, we continue our study by comparing different pricing schemes with the above approaches. These schemes include Paris metro pricing (PMP) and pricing with priority. We show that PMP does not provide better social welfare thus does not provide better cooperative solutions. Numerical examples indicate that the leader-follower game leads to an optimal solution with the same price for both \"classes\" of users in PMP. This contradicts to the intention of the original design of the scheme.","PeriodicalId":217237,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187)","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 39th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (Cat. No.00CH37187)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CDC.2000.914138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

The central issue of Internet economics is pricing. Cao et al. studied the Internet pricing based on the leader-follower game, the cooperative game, and the two-person game theory. In this paper, we continue our study by comparing different pricing schemes with the above approaches. These schemes include Paris metro pricing (PMP) and pricing with priority. We show that PMP does not provide better social welfare thus does not provide better cooperative solutions. Numerical examples indicate that the leader-follower game leads to an optimal solution with the same price for both "classes" of users in PMP. This contradicts to the intention of the original design of the scheme.
互联网定价:比较与实例
互联网经济学的核心问题是定价。Cao等人基于领导-追随者博弈、合作博弈和二人博弈理论研究了网络定价问题。在本文中,我们通过比较不同的定价方案与上述方法继续我们的研究。这些方案包括巴黎地铁定价(PMP)和优先定价。我们证明PMP不能提供更好的社会福利,因此不能提供更好的合作解决方案。数值算例表明,在PMP中,对于两类用户,领导者-追随者博弈会导致价格相同的最优解。这与方案最初设计的意图相矛盾。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信