Multinational Human Rights Litigation from the Perspective of Business

Rae Lindsay
{"title":"Multinational Human Rights Litigation from the Perspective of Business","authors":"Rae Lindsay","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rae Lindsay outlines categories of multinational human rights cases pursued in the Global North, arguing overall that litigation in distant overseas courts often serves victims poorly. She offers nuance to the popular narratives concerning multinational human rights litigation, highlighting some features that pose challenges for corporate defendants that differ in emphasis from other forms of litigation. She reviews the impact of the UNGP and their ‘legalisation’ through regulation, incorporation into contracts, and use in litigation. Observing that adversarial litigation models and practices engrained within longstanding State-based structures can operate inconsistently with the effective resolution of human-rights focused claims, she urges those representing both claimants and businesses to consider alternatives and ways to conduct litigation in a constructive and mutually respectful manner conducive to respect for human rights.","PeriodicalId":373424,"journal":{"name":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Rights Litigation against Multinationals in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198866220.003.0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rae Lindsay outlines categories of multinational human rights cases pursued in the Global North, arguing overall that litigation in distant overseas courts often serves victims poorly. She offers nuance to the popular narratives concerning multinational human rights litigation, highlighting some features that pose challenges for corporate defendants that differ in emphasis from other forms of litigation. She reviews the impact of the UNGP and their ‘legalisation’ through regulation, incorporation into contracts, and use in litigation. Observing that adversarial litigation models and practices engrained within longstanding State-based structures can operate inconsistently with the effective resolution of human-rights focused claims, she urges those representing both claimants and businesses to consider alternatives and ways to conduct litigation in a constructive and mutually respectful manner conducive to respect for human rights.
企业视角下的跨国人权诉讼
蕾·林赛(Rae Lindsay)概述了在全球北方进行的跨国人权案件的类别,并总体上认为,在遥远的海外法院进行的诉讼往往对受害者的服务很差。她提供了有关跨国人权诉讼的流行叙述的细微差别,突出了对公司被告构成挑战的一些特点,这些特点与其他形式的诉讼的重点不同。她回顾了UNGP的影响及其通过监管、纳入合同和在诉讼中使用的“合法化”。她注意到长期存在的以国家为基础的结构中根深蒂固的对抗性诉讼模式和做法可能与以人权为重点的索赔的有效解决不一致,因此她敦促代表索赔人和企业的人考虑以有利于尊重人权的建设性和相互尊重的方式进行诉讼的替代办法和方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信