Neutral-We Proppant Improves Post Treatment Cleanup and Enhances Productivity

M. Kortam, Ihab Sobhi, Mahmoud Khalil, Omar Yahia, N. Spurr
{"title":"Neutral-We Proppant Improves Post Treatment Cleanup and Enhances Productivity","authors":"M. Kortam, Ihab Sobhi, Mahmoud Khalil, Omar Yahia, N. Spurr","doi":"10.2118/210097-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A well, with very low bottomhole pressure, required frequent workover operations due to pump failures from sand production. A gravel pack was designed to minimize the production sand issues. However, to sustain low pore pressure (less than 0.1 psi/ft) without affecting well productivity, lower drawdown was needed during an acceptable sand control completion. This presented a challenge due to massive completion brine losses and increased risk of formation damage. These challenges could create impairment in well productivity. Usually, a rig utilizing coiled tubing is used to handle the flowback and unload the well.\n To increase the amounts of flowback fluid, and minimize formation damage, the completion of this well used a neutral wet proppant. The proppant, which had surfaces that are neither oil nor water wet, was used in this gravel pack to improve the flowback fluids recovery. The expected benefits of this proppant were to (1) eliminate capillary pressure within the proppant pack and (2) alter the interaction between aqueous/organic (hydrocarbons) and the proppant surfaces. This would be accomplished by decreasing the intra-molecular interactions between the fluids and the proppant surfaces thus resulting in improved flow compared to native surfaces.\n Lightweight ceramic (LWC), neutral-wettability proppant was used to improve clean-up and enhance fluid flowback recovery. Extensive laboratory testing on the proppant was performed ahead of the job, including properties and compatibility with stimulation fluid. This proppant had both hydro- and oleophobic properties. The hydrophobic properties improve the flow of the aqueous fluids, while the oleophobic properties improve the flow of the hydrocarbon phase. The proppant was pumped similarly to any other conventional proppant and no changes in the procedures were needed. After completion of the job, the well was shut-in and the flowback un-loading was performed a week later. This completion relied on using ESP to perform the cleanup and producing the well concurrently to reduce the operation time and cost spent during well unloading.\n After completion, 100% of all pumped brine was recovered leading to an enhanced production rate with no impairment or coiled tubing lifting post treatment required. The cleanup was carried out after one week from the treatment date. The well cleanup, in comparison with wells that used conventional proppant, was much faster and saved $50,000. The calculated productivity index is 3.2 compared with 2.8 bpd/psi before the treatment representing 15 % gain. No sand production was observed during production performance nor seen in the wellbore during pump replacement after two years of continuous production period. The average run life prior to this treatment was 3 months, thus impacting not only the well productivity but also the run well life.","PeriodicalId":113697,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, October 04, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210097-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A well, with very low bottomhole pressure, required frequent workover operations due to pump failures from sand production. A gravel pack was designed to minimize the production sand issues. However, to sustain low pore pressure (less than 0.1 psi/ft) without affecting well productivity, lower drawdown was needed during an acceptable sand control completion. This presented a challenge due to massive completion brine losses and increased risk of formation damage. These challenges could create impairment in well productivity. Usually, a rig utilizing coiled tubing is used to handle the flowback and unload the well. To increase the amounts of flowback fluid, and minimize formation damage, the completion of this well used a neutral wet proppant. The proppant, which had surfaces that are neither oil nor water wet, was used in this gravel pack to improve the flowback fluids recovery. The expected benefits of this proppant were to (1) eliminate capillary pressure within the proppant pack and (2) alter the interaction between aqueous/organic (hydrocarbons) and the proppant surfaces. This would be accomplished by decreasing the intra-molecular interactions between the fluids and the proppant surfaces thus resulting in improved flow compared to native surfaces. Lightweight ceramic (LWC), neutral-wettability proppant was used to improve clean-up and enhance fluid flowback recovery. Extensive laboratory testing on the proppant was performed ahead of the job, including properties and compatibility with stimulation fluid. This proppant had both hydro- and oleophobic properties. The hydrophobic properties improve the flow of the aqueous fluids, while the oleophobic properties improve the flow of the hydrocarbon phase. The proppant was pumped similarly to any other conventional proppant and no changes in the procedures were needed. After completion of the job, the well was shut-in and the flowback un-loading was performed a week later. This completion relied on using ESP to perform the cleanup and producing the well concurrently to reduce the operation time and cost spent during well unloading. After completion, 100% of all pumped brine was recovered leading to an enhanced production rate with no impairment or coiled tubing lifting post treatment required. The cleanup was carried out after one week from the treatment date. The well cleanup, in comparison with wells that used conventional proppant, was much faster and saved $50,000. The calculated productivity index is 3.2 compared with 2.8 bpd/psi before the treatment representing 15 % gain. No sand production was observed during production performance nor seen in the wellbore during pump replacement after two years of continuous production period. The average run life prior to this treatment was 3 months, thus impacting not only the well productivity but also the run well life.
Neutral-We支撑剂改善了作业后的清洁,提高了产能
一口井底压力非常低的井,由于出砂导致泵故障,需要频繁修井。砾石充填可以最大限度地减少生产出砂问题。然而,为了维持低孔隙压力(小于0.1 psi/ft)而不影响油井产能,在可接受的防砂完井期间,需要降低压降。由于大量完井盐水流失和地层损害风险增加,这给作业带来了挑战。这些挑战可能会损害油井的产能。通常,使用一个使用连续油管的钻机来处理反排和卸载井。为了增加返排液的量,并尽量减少对地层的损害,该井的完井使用了中性湿支撑剂。支撑剂的表面既不湿油也不湿水,用于砾石充填,以提高返排液的采收率。该支撑剂的预期好处是:(1)消除支撑剂充填层内的毛细管压力;(2)改变水/有机(碳氢化合物)与支撑剂表面之间的相互作用。这将通过减少流体与支撑剂表面之间的分子内相互作用来实现,从而与天然表面相比,提高流动性。采用轻质陶瓷(LWC)、中性润湿性支撑剂来改善清理效果,提高返排采收率。在作业之前,对支撑剂进行了大量的实验室测试,包括性能和与增产液的相容性。该支撑剂具有疏水和疏油两种特性。疏水性能改善了含水流体的流动,疏油性能改善了烃类相的流动。支撑剂的泵送与其他常规支撑剂类似,不需要改变程序。作业完成后,关井,一周后进行反排卸载。该完井作业依赖于使用ESP同时进行清理和生产,以减少卸载作业时间和成本。完井后,所有泵送盐水的回收率达到100%,从而提高了产量,无需进行后续处理或连续油管提升。清理工作在治疗后一周进行。与使用常规支撑剂的油井相比,该方法的清理速度要快得多,节省了5万美元。与处理前的2.8桶/天相比,计算出的产能指数为3.2,提高了15%。在生产过程中没有观察到出砂现象,在连续生产两年后更换泵的过程中也没有发现井筒出砂现象。在此处理之前,平均下入寿命为3个月,因此不仅影响了井的产能,还影响了井的下入寿命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信