The True Value of Integration

Alexander Mackay, N. Rodriguez, M. Stenhaug, Johny Samaan
{"title":"The True Value of Integration","authors":"Alexander Mackay, N. Rodriguez, M. Stenhaug, Johny Samaan","doi":"10.4043/29625-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Field development is a complicated process involving a multitude of disciplines, technologies and workflows. The typical approach to field development is long, fragmented and costly. This is due to set process and work flows with limited flexibility, inefficient tools and transfer of information, uncertainty of required scope for each phase and the management of multiple contractors.\n An example of this is a stage gate process, where regardless of the size of the prospect the same set work tasks and deliverables are required to pass to the next phase, generally no assurance is performed upfront to determine the actual requirements. Another example is field development tools, which are used in isolation from reservoir simulation to flow assurance/facilities design with limited integration, which leads to the inefficient transfer of data and a reduction in accuracy.\n The above causes unnecessarily long schedules, repetition in scope and results in sub-optimal technical solution and project economics. The requirement to transfer and interpret information between multiple parties and stages (internal and external) creates unnecessary complexity and introduces additional risk to the final technical solution.\n This paper will demonstrate the value of an Integrated Field Development approach for a large Deepwater gas condensate development offshore Australia, and how this approach can dramatically reduce duration, improve accuracy, lower contingency and maximize the economics of a project. It shows the clear advantages of facilities engineers working closely with subsurface, drilling and completions and will highlight some of the key features that make the Integrated Field Development approach a success.","PeriodicalId":214691,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","volume":"410 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, May 09, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/29625-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Field development is a complicated process involving a multitude of disciplines, technologies and workflows. The typical approach to field development is long, fragmented and costly. This is due to set process and work flows with limited flexibility, inefficient tools and transfer of information, uncertainty of required scope for each phase and the management of multiple contractors. An example of this is a stage gate process, where regardless of the size of the prospect the same set work tasks and deliverables are required to pass to the next phase, generally no assurance is performed upfront to determine the actual requirements. Another example is field development tools, which are used in isolation from reservoir simulation to flow assurance/facilities design with limited integration, which leads to the inefficient transfer of data and a reduction in accuracy. The above causes unnecessarily long schedules, repetition in scope and results in sub-optimal technical solution and project economics. The requirement to transfer and interpret information between multiple parties and stages (internal and external) creates unnecessary complexity and introduces additional risk to the final technical solution. This paper will demonstrate the value of an Integrated Field Development approach for a large Deepwater gas condensate development offshore Australia, and how this approach can dramatically reduce duration, improve accuracy, lower contingency and maximize the economics of a project. It shows the clear advantages of facilities engineers working closely with subsurface, drilling and completions and will highlight some of the key features that make the Integrated Field Development approach a success.
整合的真正价值
油田开发是一个复杂的过程,涉及众多学科、技术和工作流程。油田开发的典型方法耗时长、分散且成本高。这是由于固定的流程和工作流程灵活性有限,工具和信息传递效率低下,每个阶段所需范围的不确定性以及多个承包商的管理。这方面的一个例子是阶段门流程,无论前景的大小,都需要将相同的一组工作任务和可交付成果传递到下一阶段,通常不需要预先执行保证来确定实际需求。另一个例子是现场开发工具,这些工具与油藏模拟、流动保障/设施设计隔离使用,集成程度有限,导致数据传输效率低下,准确性降低。上述原因会导致不必要的长时间进度,范围的重复,并导致次优的技术解决方案和项目经济。在多方和多个阶段(内部和外部)之间传递和解释信息的需求造成了不必要的复杂性,并给最终的技术解决方案带来了额外的风险。本文将展示综合油田开发方法在澳大利亚近海大型深水凝析油开发中的价值,以及该方法如何显著缩短工期、提高准确性、降低突发事件并最大限度地提高项目的经济性。它展示了设施工程师与地下、钻井和完井密切合作的明显优势,并突出了使综合油田开发方法取得成功的一些关键特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信