Analysing the Value of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Information Through Its Operational Performance

E. Bahalkeh, Imran Hasan, Yuehwern Yih
{"title":"Analysing the Value of Intensive Care Unit Length of Stay Information Through Its Operational Performance","authors":"E. Bahalkeh, Imran Hasan, Yuehwern Yih","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3679697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The increasing demand for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds requires efficient admission, discharge, and care processes. Although all such efforts require predictions of Length of Stay (LOS) values, it is unclear how accurate those predictions need to be. This study aims to investigate the relationship between accuracy level of LOS predictions and operational performance indicators. To model the ICU patient flows, a discrete event simulation model is developed. A linear function of actual and simulated LOS values is used to measure the accuracy level of the predictions. Multiple configurations of patient mix and patient waiting threshold were included in the simulation scenarios. Performance indicators are average waiting time of patients for an ICU bed and overall admission ratios. Further statistical tests were carried out to evaluate the significance of the results. Results suggest that inaccurate LOS predictions overestimated both average waiting time of patients for an ICU bed and overall admission rates. The gaps increased when more elective patients were included in the patient mix. Moreover, higher waiting thresholds (i.e. maximum amount of time a patient will wait for an ICU bed) yielded higher values in both performance indicators.","PeriodicalId":296500,"journal":{"name":"EngRN: Systems Engineering (Topic)","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EngRN: Systems Engineering (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3679697","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increasing demand for Intensive Care Unit (ICU) beds requires efficient admission, discharge, and care processes. Although all such efforts require predictions of Length of Stay (LOS) values, it is unclear how accurate those predictions need to be. This study aims to investigate the relationship between accuracy level of LOS predictions and operational performance indicators. To model the ICU patient flows, a discrete event simulation model is developed. A linear function of actual and simulated LOS values is used to measure the accuracy level of the predictions. Multiple configurations of patient mix and patient waiting threshold were included in the simulation scenarios. Performance indicators are average waiting time of patients for an ICU bed and overall admission ratios. Further statistical tests were carried out to evaluate the significance of the results. Results suggest that inaccurate LOS predictions overestimated both average waiting time of patients for an ICU bed and overall admission rates. The gaps increased when more elective patients were included in the patient mix. Moreover, higher waiting thresholds (i.e. maximum amount of time a patient will wait for an ICU bed) yielded higher values in both performance indicators.
从运营绩效分析重症监护病房住院时间信息的价值
对重症监护病房(ICU)床位日益增长的需求要求有效的入院、出院和护理过程。尽管所有这些努力都需要预测逗留时间(LOS)值,但目前尚不清楚这些预测需要有多准确。本研究旨在探讨LOS预测的准确度水平与营运绩效指标之间的关系。为了对ICU病人流进行建模,建立了离散事件仿真模型。使用实际和模拟LOS值的线性函数来衡量预测的精度水平。仿真场景包括患者组合和患者等待阈值的多种配置。绩效指标是患者在ICU床位的平均等待时间和总体入院率。进一步进行统计检验以评价结果的显著性。结果表明,不准确的LOS预测高估了患者在ICU床位的平均等待时间和总体入院率。当更多的选择性患者被纳入患者组合时,差距就会增加。此外,更高的等待阈值(即患者等待ICU床位的最大时间)在两个性能指标中都产生了更高的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信