Do proctored online University exams in Covid-19 era affect final grades respect face-to-face exams?

A. Alegre-Martínez, M. I. Martínez-Martínez, J. Alfonso-Sánchez
{"title":"Do proctored online University exams in Covid-19 era affect final grades respect face-to-face exams?","authors":"A. Alegre-Martínez, M. I. Martínez-Martínez, J. Alfonso-Sánchez","doi":"10.4995/head21.2021.12701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 pandemic forced universities to convert their traditional face-to-face exams to online exams with doubts as to whether student cheating or technical difficulties would affect their final grades. After taking three of these exams online, we considered comparing their grades with those of previous years on traditional exams. The average mark of the traditional exams before the pandemic was 6.95 over 10, while the average mark of the three exams carried out in the Covid-19 era is 6.64. The student's t test indicated that there are no significant differences between the two types of exams in the mean (p = 0.408), the median (p = 0.378), the range (p = 0.307), the minimum (p = 0.410) and the maximum (p = 0.072). Taking online exams did not modify the exam grades compared to previous years. There is a lot of variability in similar studies in the literature due to cheating that can be performed in online exams. A proctoring system, good question design, and limited exam time can minimize these differences.","PeriodicalId":169443,"journal":{"name":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"7th International Conference on Higher Education Advances (HEAd'21)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/head21.2021.12701","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic forced universities to convert their traditional face-to-face exams to online exams with doubts as to whether student cheating or technical difficulties would affect their final grades. After taking three of these exams online, we considered comparing their grades with those of previous years on traditional exams. The average mark of the traditional exams before the pandemic was 6.95 over 10, while the average mark of the three exams carried out in the Covid-19 era is 6.64. The student's t test indicated that there are no significant differences between the two types of exams in the mean (p = 0.408), the median (p = 0.378), the range (p = 0.307), the minimum (p = 0.410) and the maximum (p = 0.072). Taking online exams did not modify the exam grades compared to previous years. There is a lot of variability in similar studies in the literature due to cheating that can be performed in online exams. A proctoring system, good question design, and limited exam time can minimize these differences.
新冠肺炎疫情下,大学在线监考是否会影响期末成绩?
新冠肺炎疫情迫使大学将传统的面对面考试改为在线考试,因为人们怀疑学生作弊或技术困难是否会影响他们的最终成绩。在参加了三次在线考试后,我们考虑将他们的成绩与往年的传统考试成绩进行比较。新冠肺炎疫情前的传统考试平均分为6.95分(满分10分),新冠肺炎疫情后的三次考试平均分为6.64分。学生t检验表明,两种考试在平均值(p = 0.408)、中位数(p = 0.378)、极差(p = 0.307)、最小值(p = 0.410)和最大值(p = 0.072)方面均无显著差异。与前几年相比,参加在线考试并没有改变考试成绩。由于在线考试中可能存在作弊行为,在文献中的类似研究中存在很多差异。监考系统、好的问题设计和有限的考试时间可以将这些差异降到最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信