Infrastructural Thinking in China: A Research Agenda

A. Rippa, T. Oakes
{"title":"Infrastructural Thinking in China: A Research Agenda","authors":"A. Rippa, T. Oakes","doi":"10.1017/S0305741023001005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Despite China's leading role in the construction of infrastructure over the past decades, the most influential paradigms for the study of infrastructure in the social sciences originate from research conducted elsewhere. This introduction to the special section “Chinese Infrastructure: Techno-politics, Materialities, Legacies” seeks to address this apparent gap, and contributes to building an innovative research agenda for an infrastructural approach in the China studies field. To do so, it pushes forward an understanding of infrastructure as both an empirically rich material object of research and an analytical strategy for framing research questions. We draw from two strands of inquiry: recent efforts to rethink the materiality of infrastructures not as an inert or stable basis upon which more dynamic social processes emerge, but rather as unstable assemblages of human and non-human agencies; and scholarship that explores the often hidden (techno-)political dimensions of infrastructures, through which certain intended and unintended outcomes emerge less from the realms of policy and implementation and more from the material dispositions and effects of infrastructural formations. These strands of inquiry are brought together as part of our effort to recognize that the infrastructural basis of China's approach to development and statecraft deserves a more concerted theorizing of infrastructure than we have seen thus far.","PeriodicalId":223807,"journal":{"name":"The China Quarterly","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The China Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741023001005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Despite China's leading role in the construction of infrastructure over the past decades, the most influential paradigms for the study of infrastructure in the social sciences originate from research conducted elsewhere. This introduction to the special section “Chinese Infrastructure: Techno-politics, Materialities, Legacies” seeks to address this apparent gap, and contributes to building an innovative research agenda for an infrastructural approach in the China studies field. To do so, it pushes forward an understanding of infrastructure as both an empirically rich material object of research and an analytical strategy for framing research questions. We draw from two strands of inquiry: recent efforts to rethink the materiality of infrastructures not as an inert or stable basis upon which more dynamic social processes emerge, but rather as unstable assemblages of human and non-human agencies; and scholarship that explores the often hidden (techno-)political dimensions of infrastructures, through which certain intended and unintended outcomes emerge less from the realms of policy and implementation and more from the material dispositions and effects of infrastructural formations. These strands of inquiry are brought together as part of our effort to recognize that the infrastructural basis of China's approach to development and statecraft deserves a more concerted theorizing of infrastructure than we have seen thus far.
中国的基础设施思维:一个研究议程
尽管中国在过去几十年里在基础设施建设方面发挥了主导作用,但社会科学领域基础设施研究最具影响力的范式源自其他地方的研究。“中国基础设施:技术政治、物质性、遗产”这一特殊章节的引言试图解决这一明显的差距,并有助于为中国研究领域的基础设施方法建立一个创新的研究议程。为了做到这一点,它推动了对基础设施的理解,既是一个经验丰富的研究物质对象,也是一个构建研究问题的分析策略。我们从两方面的调查中得出结论:最近的努力是重新思考基础设施的重要性,它不是作为一种惰性或稳定的基础,在此基础上出现更多的动态社会进程,而是作为人类和非人类机构的不稳定组合;以及探索基础设施通常隐藏的(技术)政治层面的学术研究,通过这些研究,某些有意和无意的结果较少来自政策和实施领域,而更多地来自基础设施结构的物质配置和影响。这些调查的线索汇集在一起,作为我们认识到中国发展和治国方略的基础设施基础的努力的一部分,值得比我们迄今为止所看到的更协调一致的基础设施理论化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信