Equality, marginalisation, and hegemonic negotiation: Embodied understandings of the built and designed environment

Stina Ericsson
{"title":"Equality, marginalisation, and hegemonic negotiation: Embodied understandings of the built and designed environment","authors":"Stina Ericsson","doi":"10.1177/26349795231178936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"People’s experience of interacting with the built environment, such as entering a building, varies depending on how the environment is designed. For instance, a set of steps may be tackled without conscious thought by one person while they may prevent another person from entering altogether. Such processes mean that people are being categorised in different ways. The aim of this article is to add to our knowledge of how the built and designed environment, as semiotic resources with social meanings, variously constrains and enables individuals’ participation in society, based on categorisation. Data is collected using a citizen science approach, whereby people have been invited to submit photos and comments about their experiences of the physical environment. This data is analysed using Spatial Discourse Analysis and theories of embodiment. The analysis shows how equivalence, marginalisation, and hegemonic negotiation variously inform people’s sense-making of the physical environment as a multimodal resource. The article uses this analysis to expose unspoken norms in the physical environment and to extend Spatial Discourse Analysis. It argues that multimodal analyses of the physical environment need to further consider the situated materiality of the interaction between people and the environment by accounting for individual variance.","PeriodicalId":153235,"journal":{"name":"Multimodality & Society","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Multimodality & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26349795231178936","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

People’s experience of interacting with the built environment, such as entering a building, varies depending on how the environment is designed. For instance, a set of steps may be tackled without conscious thought by one person while they may prevent another person from entering altogether. Such processes mean that people are being categorised in different ways. The aim of this article is to add to our knowledge of how the built and designed environment, as semiotic resources with social meanings, variously constrains and enables individuals’ participation in society, based on categorisation. Data is collected using a citizen science approach, whereby people have been invited to submit photos and comments about their experiences of the physical environment. This data is analysed using Spatial Discourse Analysis and theories of embodiment. The analysis shows how equivalence, marginalisation, and hegemonic negotiation variously inform people’s sense-making of the physical environment as a multimodal resource. The article uses this analysis to expose unspoken norms in the physical environment and to extend Spatial Discourse Analysis. It argues that multimodal analyses of the physical environment need to further consider the situated materiality of the interaction between people and the environment by accounting for individual variance.
平等、边缘化和霸权谈判:对建筑和设计环境的具体理解
人们与建筑环境互动的体验,比如进入建筑,取决于环境的设计方式。例如,一组步骤可能由一个人无意识地处理,而它们可能完全阻止另一个人进入。这样的过程意味着人们被以不同的方式分类。本文的目的是增加我们对建筑和设计环境的认识,作为具有社会意义的符号资源,如何以分类为基础,在不同程度上限制和促进个人参与社会。数据的收集采用了一种公民科学的方法,即邀请人们提交他们对自然环境的体验的照片和评论。运用空间语篇分析和体现理论对这些数据进行分析。分析表明,对等、边缘化和霸权谈判如何以不同的方式影响人们对自然环境作为一种多模式资源的理解。本文利用这一分析来揭示自然环境中的潜规则,并对空间语篇分析进行拓展。它认为,物理环境的多模态分析需要通过考虑个体差异来进一步考虑人与环境之间相互作用的位置重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信