Development of a clinical feeding assessment scale for very young infants in South Africa

Mari Viviers, A. Kritzinger, B. Vinck
{"title":"Development of a clinical feeding assessment scale for very young infants in South Africa","authors":"Mari Viviers, A. Kritzinger, B. Vinck","doi":"10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background There is a need for validated neonatal feeding assessment instruments in South Africa. A locally developed instrument may contribute to standardised evaluation procedures of high-risk neonates and address needs in resource constrained developing settings. Objective The aim of the study was to develop and validate the content of a clinical feeding assessment scale to diagnose oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in neonates. Method The Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) was developed using the Delphi method. Five international and South African speech-language therapists (SLTs) formed the expert panel, participating in two rounds of electronic questionnaires to develop and validate the content of the NFAS. Results All participants agreed on the need for the development of a valid clinical feeding assessment instrument to use with the neonatal population. The initial NFAS consisted of 240 items across 8 sections, and after the Delphi process was implemented, the final format was reduced to 211 items across 6 sections. The final format of the NFAS is scored using a binary scoring system guiding the clinician to diagnose the presence or absence of OPD. All members agreed on the format, the scoring system and the feeding constructs addressed in the revised final format of the NFAS. Conclusion The Delphi method and the diverse clinical and research experience of participants could be integrated to develop the NFAS which may be used in clinical practice in South Africa or similar developing contexts. Because of demographically different work settings marked by developed versus developing contexts, participants did not have the same expectations of a clinical dysphagia assessment. The international participants contributed to evidence-based content development. Local participants considered the contextual challenges of South African SLTs entering the field with basic competencies in neonatal dysphagia management, thereby justifying a comprehensive clinical instrument. The NFAS is aimed at clinicians working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units where they manage large caseloads of high-risk neonates. Further validation of the NFAS is recommended to determine its criterion validity in comparison with a widely accepted standard such as the modified barium swallow study.","PeriodicalId":291413,"journal":{"name":"The South African Journal of Communication Disorders","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The South African Journal of Communication Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/sajcd.v63i1.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background There is a need for validated neonatal feeding assessment instruments in South Africa. A locally developed instrument may contribute to standardised evaluation procedures of high-risk neonates and address needs in resource constrained developing settings. Objective The aim of the study was to develop and validate the content of a clinical feeding assessment scale to diagnose oropharyngeal dysphagia (OPD) in neonates. Method The Neonatal Feeding Assessment Scale (NFAS) was developed using the Delphi method. Five international and South African speech-language therapists (SLTs) formed the expert panel, participating in two rounds of electronic questionnaires to develop and validate the content of the NFAS. Results All participants agreed on the need for the development of a valid clinical feeding assessment instrument to use with the neonatal population. The initial NFAS consisted of 240 items across 8 sections, and after the Delphi process was implemented, the final format was reduced to 211 items across 6 sections. The final format of the NFAS is scored using a binary scoring system guiding the clinician to diagnose the presence or absence of OPD. All members agreed on the format, the scoring system and the feeding constructs addressed in the revised final format of the NFAS. Conclusion The Delphi method and the diverse clinical and research experience of participants could be integrated to develop the NFAS which may be used in clinical practice in South Africa or similar developing contexts. Because of demographically different work settings marked by developed versus developing contexts, participants did not have the same expectations of a clinical dysphagia assessment. The international participants contributed to evidence-based content development. Local participants considered the contextual challenges of South African SLTs entering the field with basic competencies in neonatal dysphagia management, thereby justifying a comprehensive clinical instrument. The NFAS is aimed at clinicians working in Neonatal Intensive Care Units where they manage large caseloads of high-risk neonates. Further validation of the NFAS is recommended to determine its criterion validity in comparison with a widely accepted standard such as the modified barium swallow study.
南非幼龄婴儿临床喂养评估量表的开发
背景南非需要有效的新生儿喂养评估工具。当地开发的工具可能有助于高风险新生儿的标准化评估程序,并解决资源有限的发展中国家的需求。目的制定并验证新生儿口咽吞咽困难(OPD)的临床喂养评定量表。方法采用德尔菲法编制新生儿喂养评价量表(NFAS)。五名国际和南非语言治疗师(slt)组成了专家小组,参与了两轮电子问卷调查,以开发和验证NFAS的内容。结果所有与会者一致认为有必要开发一种适用于新生儿群体的有效的临床喂养评估仪器。最初的NFAS由8个部分的240个项目组成,在Delphi过程实施后,最终的格式减少到6个部分的211个项目。NFAS的最终格式是使用二元评分系统进行评分,指导临床医生诊断是否存在门诊疾病。所有成员同意在NFAS的修订的最终格式中处理的格式、评分系统和喂养结构。结论将德尔菲法与参试者不同的临床和研究经验相结合,开发出的NFAS可用于南非或类似发展中国家的临床实践。由于发达国家和发展中国家在人口统计学上的工作环境不同,参与者对临床吞咽困难评估的期望不同。国际参与者为基于证据的内容开发做出了贡献。当地参与者考虑了南非slt在新生儿吞咽困难管理方面的基本能力进入该领域的背景挑战,从而证明了综合临床工具的必要性。NFAS的目标是在新生儿重症监护病房工作的临床医生,在那里他们管理大量的高危新生儿病例。建议对NFAS进行进一步的验证,以确定其标准的有效性,并与广泛接受的标准(如改良钡吞入研究)进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书