Selection between AHP and TOPSIS for Academic Information Systems Decision Making Model

Jeffry Andhika Putra, Tsabit Rakhman, M. K. Biddinika
{"title":"Selection between AHP and TOPSIS for Academic Information Systems Decision Making Model","authors":"Jeffry Andhika Putra, Tsabit Rakhman, M. K. Biddinika","doi":"10.5220/0009878700860089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One way to develop a system of academic information using applications Free Open Source (FOS) that are circulating. Academic information system developers need to determine the appropriate FOS used to develop academic information system based on the criteria required and reliability of FOS. One way to help decisionmaking can be used MADM models using AHP and TOPSIS. In this study, applying a comparative analysis of the two methods, the method of AHP and TOPSIS with analytical testing calculations used to compare the three-applications FOS Academic Information System, Campus Academic Information System (Siakad), Academic Information Systems Integrated (Sikadu), as well as SISFOKOL to develop academic information systems.","PeriodicalId":135180,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Sciences","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Applied Science, Engineering and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0009878700860089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

One way to develop a system of academic information using applications Free Open Source (FOS) that are circulating. Academic information system developers need to determine the appropriate FOS used to develop academic information system based on the criteria required and reliability of FOS. One way to help decisionmaking can be used MADM models using AHP and TOPSIS. In this study, applying a comparative analysis of the two methods, the method of AHP and TOPSIS with analytical testing calculations used to compare the three-applications FOS Academic Information System, Campus Academic Information System (Siakad), Academic Information Systems Integrated (Sikadu), as well as SISFOKOL to develop academic information systems.
学术信息系统决策模型AHP与TOPSIS的选择
一种方法是开发一个系统的学术信息使用应用程序免费开放源代码(FOS)正在流通。学术信息系统开发者需要根据学术信息系统所要求的标准和学术信息系统的可靠性来确定合适的学术信息系统。一种帮助决策的方法是利用AHP和TOPSIS的MADM模型。本研究采用AHP法和TOPSIS法两种方法进行比较分析,结合分析检验计算,比较了FOS学术信息系统、校园学术信息系统(Siakad)、学术信息系统集成(Sikadu)和SISFOKOL三种应用软件开发学术信息系统的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信