{"title":"PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS ON GPSR PROTOCOL IN VANETS ENVIRONMENT OF OVERLAY NETWORK AND FORWARDING NODE SELECTION METHODS","authors":"Ahmad Faqih Habibi, Radityo Anggoro","doi":"10.20527/jtiulm.v7i2.131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"VANETs are technology in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in driving safety and convenient network services for vehicle users. However, the high mobility of VANETs makes the topology change frequently, resulting in the unavailability of routes and causing communication failures between nodes. Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) is a routing protocol that solves communication problems in the VANETs environment. GPSR is a geographic routing protocol that uses information on the location of neighbouring nodes and the transmission range to the nearest destination node. But, GPSR does not always find the optimal route because not all nearby nodes can forward packets to their destination during heavy traffic and many intersections. \nIn this research, the overlay network and forwarding node selection methods will be used to solve problems in the GPSR routing protocol related to communication instability because of changing node positions. Based on the results of testing and analysis that has been carried out on a grid scenario with 50 nodes, the Packet Delivery Ratio results are 32.60. In contrast, the results for the real scenario with the same nodes produce a value of 64. The analysis of End to End Delay in the 50-node grid scenario produces 5.64, while the real scenario results with 50 nodes yield the value of 24.11. The analysis Routing Overhead in the grid scenario with 50 nodes produces a value of 39,978, while the results of the real scenario with 50 nodes get a value of 10,239. With the result of these two analysis methods, it is expected to increase the average value of package delivery.","PeriodicalId":330464,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (JTIULM)","volume":"133 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Universitas Lambung Mangkurat (JTIULM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20527/jtiulm.v7i2.131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
VANETs are technology in Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) in driving safety and convenient network services for vehicle users. However, the high mobility of VANETs makes the topology change frequently, resulting in the unavailability of routes and causing communication failures between nodes. Greedy Perimeter Stateless Routing (GPSR) is a routing protocol that solves communication problems in the VANETs environment. GPSR is a geographic routing protocol that uses information on the location of neighbouring nodes and the transmission range to the nearest destination node. But, GPSR does not always find the optimal route because not all nearby nodes can forward packets to their destination during heavy traffic and many intersections.
In this research, the overlay network and forwarding node selection methods will be used to solve problems in the GPSR routing protocol related to communication instability because of changing node positions. Based on the results of testing and analysis that has been carried out on a grid scenario with 50 nodes, the Packet Delivery Ratio results are 32.60. In contrast, the results for the real scenario with the same nodes produce a value of 64. The analysis of End to End Delay in the 50-node grid scenario produces 5.64, while the real scenario results with 50 nodes yield the value of 24.11. The analysis Routing Overhead in the grid scenario with 50 nodes produces a value of 39,978, while the results of the real scenario with 50 nodes get a value of 10,239. With the result of these two analysis methods, it is expected to increase the average value of package delivery.