Beyond Reason: Uniting Intuition and Rationality in Software Architecture Decision Making

C. Pretorius
{"title":"Beyond Reason: Uniting Intuition and Rationality in Software Architecture Decision Making","authors":"C. Pretorius","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intuition and rationality, or System 1 and System 2 when speaking more broadly, are two modes of cognitive processing that all humans use when making decisions. System 1 is a type of thinking that involves faster, more holistic forms of processing that tend to use fewer mental resources, whereas System 2 tends to be slower, more deliberate, and more mentally taxing. Both System 1 and System 2 have been shown to be beneficial in a number of decision making contexts. Although it is clear that both System 1 and System 2 have their place in decision making, how and when to use each processing style in software architecture design decision making is a question that remains largely unanswered. Therefore, our research aims to fill this gap by: (i) determining what is actually known from published research regarding the use of System 1 and System 2 in software architecture design decision making, (ii) evaluating System 1 and System 2 empirically in terms of software architecture decision making performance, and: (iii) developing and validating a decision support model to support the use of System 1 alongside System 2 in software architecture design decision making.","PeriodicalId":239999,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"137 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Intuition and rationality, or System 1 and System 2 when speaking more broadly, are two modes of cognitive processing that all humans use when making decisions. System 1 is a type of thinking that involves faster, more holistic forms of processing that tend to use fewer mental resources, whereas System 2 tends to be slower, more deliberate, and more mentally taxing. Both System 1 and System 2 have been shown to be beneficial in a number of decision making contexts. Although it is clear that both System 1 and System 2 have their place in decision making, how and when to use each processing style in software architecture design decision making is a question that remains largely unanswered. Therefore, our research aims to fill this gap by: (i) determining what is actually known from published research regarding the use of System 1 and System 2 in software architecture design decision making, (ii) evaluating System 1 and System 2 empirically in terms of software architecture decision making performance, and: (iii) developing and validating a decision support model to support the use of System 1 alongside System 2 in software architecture design decision making.
超越理性:统一软件架构决策中的直觉和理性
直觉和理性,或者更广泛地说,系统1和系统2,是所有人类在做决定时使用的两种认知处理模式。系统1是一种思维方式,它涉及更快、更全面的处理形式,往往使用更少的脑力资源,而系统2往往更慢、更深思熟虑、更耗费脑力。系统1和系统2已被证明在许多决策环境中都是有益的。虽然很明显系统1和系统2在决策制定中都有自己的位置,但是在软件架构设计决策制定中如何以及何时使用每种处理风格仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。因此,我们的研究旨在通过以下方式来填补这一空白:(i)确定关于在软件架构设计决策中使用系统1和系统2的已发表研究中实际知道的内容,(ii)根据软件架构决策性能对系统1和系统2进行经验评估,以及:(iii)开发和验证决策支持模型,以支持在软件架构设计决策中同时使用系统1和系统2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信