A Numerical Model for Pressure Transient Analysis in Fractured Reservoirs with Poorly Connected Fractures

Hongyang Chu, X. Liao, Zhiming Chen, Youwei He, Jiandong Zou, Jiali Zhang, J. Zhao, Jiaxin Wei
{"title":"A Numerical Model for Pressure Transient Analysis in Fractured Reservoirs with Poorly Connected Fractures","authors":"Hongyang Chu, X. Liao, Zhiming Chen, Youwei He, Jiandong Zou, Jiali Zhang, J. Zhao, Jiaxin Wei","doi":"10.2118/191246-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Given that some fractured reservoirs have poorly connected natural fractures, the conventional Warren and Root model (1963) may not applicable. To narrow this gap, we introduce a numerical method to build a dual-porosity model for those reservoirs. To verify this numerical model, we perform a case study with a semianalytical model (SPE-187290-MS) for a discretely fractured reservoir. During the model verification, the pressure response from this numerical model are compared to the semianalytical results for fractured reservoirs with poorly connected fractures. It is found that the difference between the pressure responses obtained by these two models is negligible. Results show that pressure transient behaviors of wells with intersecting fracture exhibit completely different flow regimes with those without intersecting fracture. Bilinear flow, linear flow, transient flow, and pseudo-radial flow may progressively occur for intersecting fracture. A radial flow in matrix occurs for discrete fractures, before the impacts of nature fractures exhibit. Once these impacts are detected, the pressure derivatives show a dual-porosity feature \"V-shape\", which is virtually quite different from that in Warren and Root's dual-porosity model.","PeriodicalId":415543,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","volume":"195 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, June 26, 2018","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/191246-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Given that some fractured reservoirs have poorly connected natural fractures, the conventional Warren and Root model (1963) may not applicable. To narrow this gap, we introduce a numerical method to build a dual-porosity model for those reservoirs. To verify this numerical model, we perform a case study with a semianalytical model (SPE-187290-MS) for a discretely fractured reservoir. During the model verification, the pressure response from this numerical model are compared to the semianalytical results for fractured reservoirs with poorly connected fractures. It is found that the difference between the pressure responses obtained by these two models is negligible. Results show that pressure transient behaviors of wells with intersecting fracture exhibit completely different flow regimes with those without intersecting fracture. Bilinear flow, linear flow, transient flow, and pseudo-radial flow may progressively occur for intersecting fracture. A radial flow in matrix occurs for discrete fractures, before the impacts of nature fractures exhibit. Once these impacts are detected, the pressure derivatives show a dual-porosity feature "V-shape", which is virtually quite different from that in Warren and Root's dual-porosity model.
裂缝连通不良的裂缝性储层压力瞬态分析数值模型
考虑到一些裂缝性储层具有连接不良的天然裂缝,传统的Warren和Root模型(1963)可能不适用。为了缩小这一差距,我们引入了一种数值方法来建立这些储层的双重孔隙度模型。为了验证这一数值模型,我们对离散裂缝油藏进行了半解析模型(SPE-187290-MS)的案例研究。在模型验证过程中,将该数值模型的压力响应与裂缝连通性差的裂缝性油藏的半解析结果进行了比较。结果表明,两种模型得到的压力响应之间的差异可以忽略不计。结果表明,有相交裂缝的井与无相交裂缝的井的压力瞬态特征完全不同。相交裂缝可能逐渐发生双线性流动、线性流动、瞬态流动和伪径向流动。在自然裂缝产生影响之前,离散裂缝在基质中发生径向流动。一旦检测到这些影响,压力导数就会显示出双重孔隙度的“v形”特征,这与Warren和Root的双重孔隙度模型几乎完全不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信