Machine learning methods for model classification: a comparative study

José Antonio Hernández López, Riccardo Rubei, J. Cuadrado, D. D. Ruscio
{"title":"Machine learning methods for model classification: a comparative study","authors":"José Antonio Hernández López, Riccardo Rubei, J. Cuadrado, D. D. Ruscio","doi":"10.1145/3550355.3552461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the quest to reuse modeling artifacts, academics and industry have proposed several model repositories over the last decade. Different storage and indexing techniques have been conceived to facilitate searching capabilities to help users find reusable artifacts that might fit the situation at hand. In this respect, machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to categorize and group large sets of modeling artifacts automatically. This paper reports the results of a comparative study of different ML classification techniques employed to automatically label models stored in model repositories. We have built a framework to systematically compare different ML models (feed-forward neural networks, graph neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, support version machines, etc.) with varying model encodings (TF-IDF, word embeddings, graphs and paths). We apply this framework to two datasets of about 5,000 Ecore and 5,000 UML models. We show that specific ML models and encodings perform better than others depending on the characteristics of the available datasets (e.g., the presence of duplicates) and on the goals to be achieved.","PeriodicalId":303547,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Model Driven Engineering Languages and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3550355.3552461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

In the quest to reuse modeling artifacts, academics and industry have proposed several model repositories over the last decade. Different storage and indexing techniques have been conceived to facilitate searching capabilities to help users find reusable artifacts that might fit the situation at hand. In this respect, machine learning (ML) techniques have been proposed to categorize and group large sets of modeling artifacts automatically. This paper reports the results of a comparative study of different ML classification techniques employed to automatically label models stored in model repositories. We have built a framework to systematically compare different ML models (feed-forward neural networks, graph neural networks, k-nearest neighbors, support version machines, etc.) with varying model encodings (TF-IDF, word embeddings, graphs and paths). We apply this framework to two datasets of about 5,000 Ecore and 5,000 UML models. We show that specific ML models and encodings perform better than others depending on the characteristics of the available datasets (e.g., the presence of duplicates) and on the goals to be achieved.
模型分类的机器学习方法:比较研究
在寻求重用建模工件的过程中,学术界和工业界在过去十年中提出了几个模型存储库。已经设想了不同的存储和索引技术来促进搜索功能,以帮助用户找到可能适合手头情况的可重用构件。在这方面,已经提出了机器学习(ML)技术来自动对大型建模工件集进行分类和分组。本文报告了用于自动标记存储在模型库中的模型的不同ML分类技术的比较研究结果。我们建立了一个框架来系统地比较不同模型编码(TF-IDF、词嵌入、图和路径)的不同ML模型(前馈神经网络、图神经网络、k近邻、支持版本机等)。我们将这个框架应用于大约5000个Ecore模型和5000个UML模型的两个数据集。我们表明,特定的ML模型和编码比其他模型和编码表现得更好,这取决于可用数据集的特征(例如,重复的存在)和要实现的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信