Assessing Convolutional Neural Networks Reliability through Statistical Fault Injections

A. Ruospo, G. Gavarini, C. D. Sio, J. Guerrero, L. Sterpone, M. Reorda, Ernesto Sánchez, Riccardo Mariani, J. Aribido, J. Athavale
{"title":"Assessing Convolutional Neural Networks Reliability through Statistical Fault Injections","authors":"A. Ruospo, G. Gavarini, C. D. Sio, J. Guerrero, L. Sterpone, M. Reorda, Ernesto Sánchez, Riccardo Mariani, J. Aribido, J. Athavale","doi":"10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10136998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessing the reliability of modern devices running CNN algorithms is a very difficult task. Actually, the complexity of the state-of-the-art devices makes exhaustive Fault Injection (FI) campaigns impractical and typically out of the computational capabilities. A possible solution consists of resorting to statistical FI campaigns that allow a reduction in the number of needed experiments by injecting only a carefully selected small part of it. Under specific hypothesis, statistical FIs guarantee an accurate picture of the problem, albeit selecting a reduced sample size. The main problems today are related to the choice of the sample size, the location of the faults, and the correct understanding of the statistical assumptions. The intent of this paper is twofold: first, we describe how to correctly specify statistical FIs for Convolutional Neural Networks; second, we propose a data analysis on the CNN parameters that drastically reduces the number of FIs needed to achieve statistically significant results without compromising the validity of the proposed method. The methodology is experimentally validated on two CNNs, ResNet-20 and MobileNetV2, and the results show that a statistical FI campaign on about 1.21% and 0.55% of the possible faults, provides very precise information of the CNN reliability. The statistical results have been confirmed by the exhaustive FI campaigns on the same cases of study.","PeriodicalId":340349,"journal":{"name":"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 Design, Automation & Test in Europe Conference & Exhibition (DATE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/DATE56975.2023.10136998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Assessing the reliability of modern devices running CNN algorithms is a very difficult task. Actually, the complexity of the state-of-the-art devices makes exhaustive Fault Injection (FI) campaigns impractical and typically out of the computational capabilities. A possible solution consists of resorting to statistical FI campaigns that allow a reduction in the number of needed experiments by injecting only a carefully selected small part of it. Under specific hypothesis, statistical FIs guarantee an accurate picture of the problem, albeit selecting a reduced sample size. The main problems today are related to the choice of the sample size, the location of the faults, and the correct understanding of the statistical assumptions. The intent of this paper is twofold: first, we describe how to correctly specify statistical FIs for Convolutional Neural Networks; second, we propose a data analysis on the CNN parameters that drastically reduces the number of FIs needed to achieve statistically significant results without compromising the validity of the proposed method. The methodology is experimentally validated on two CNNs, ResNet-20 and MobileNetV2, and the results show that a statistical FI campaign on about 1.21% and 0.55% of the possible faults, provides very precise information of the CNN reliability. The statistical results have been confirmed by the exhaustive FI campaigns on the same cases of study.
基于统计故障注入的卷积神经网络可靠性评估
评估运行CNN算法的现代设备的可靠性是一项非常困难的任务。实际上,最先进设备的复杂性使得详尽的故障注入(FI)活动不切实际,并且通常超出了计算能力。一种可能的解决办法是诉诸统计FI运动,通过只注入精心挑选的一小部分来减少所需实验的数量。在特定的假设下,统计fi保证了问题的准确图景,尽管选择了减少的样本量。今天的主要问题与样本量的选择、故障的位置以及对统计假设的正确理解有关。本文的目的是双重的:首先,我们描述了如何正确地指定卷积神经网络的统计fi;其次,我们提出对CNN参数进行数据分析,在不影响所提方法有效性的情况下,大大减少了获得统计显著结果所需的fi数量。该方法在ResNet-20和MobileNetV2两个CNN上进行了实验验证,结果表明,统计FI运动分别对1.21%和0.55%的可能故障进行了检测,提供了非常精确的CNN可靠性信息。统计结果已被详尽的FI运动对相同的研究案例所证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信