Performance evaluation of three Network-on-Chip (NoC) architectures (Invited)

Jing Chen, P. Gillard, Cheng Li
{"title":"Performance evaluation of three Network-on-Chip (NoC) architectures (Invited)","authors":"Jing Chen, P. Gillard, Cheng Li","doi":"10.1109/ICCChina.2012.6356997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the number of processing elements which can be placed on a single chip doubles about every two years, both System-on-Chip (SoC) and the microprocessor market call for high-performance, flexible, scalable, and design-friendly interconnection network architectures [1]. Network-on-Chip (NoC) has been proposed as a solution to multi-core communication problems. The advantages of NoC include high bandwidth, low latency, low power consumption and scalability. The interconnection architecture has a significant impact on the performance of networks in terms of point-to-point delay, throughput, and loss rate. We evaluate the performance of three NoC architectures, including the torus, the Metacube and the hypercube under Poisson and bit-complement traffic pattern. Network sizes of 32, 64, 128, 512 and 1024 nodes are considered. Three injection rates ranging from 10% to 30% are applied to the target networks. Performance evaluation reflects that the torus is a viable choice for small networks (32-64 nodes) and the Metacube exhibits similar performance to the hypercube for 128 nodes and 512 nodes networks under a moderate load. Lower link complexity and fewer long wires make the Metacube a cheaper alternative to the hypercube.","PeriodicalId":154082,"journal":{"name":"2012 1st IEEE International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 1st IEEE International Conference on Communications in China (ICCC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCChina.2012.6356997","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

As the number of processing elements which can be placed on a single chip doubles about every two years, both System-on-Chip (SoC) and the microprocessor market call for high-performance, flexible, scalable, and design-friendly interconnection network architectures [1]. Network-on-Chip (NoC) has been proposed as a solution to multi-core communication problems. The advantages of NoC include high bandwidth, low latency, low power consumption and scalability. The interconnection architecture has a significant impact on the performance of networks in terms of point-to-point delay, throughput, and loss rate. We evaluate the performance of three NoC architectures, including the torus, the Metacube and the hypercube under Poisson and bit-complement traffic pattern. Network sizes of 32, 64, 128, 512 and 1024 nodes are considered. Three injection rates ranging from 10% to 30% are applied to the target networks. Performance evaluation reflects that the torus is a viable choice for small networks (32-64 nodes) and the Metacube exhibits similar performance to the hypercube for 128 nodes and 512 nodes networks under a moderate load. Lower link complexity and fewer long wires make the Metacube a cheaper alternative to the hypercube.
三种片上网络(NoC)架构的性能评估(特邀)
由于可以放置在单个芯片上的处理元件的数量大约每两年翻一番,片上系统(SoC)和微处理器市场都需要高性能、灵活、可扩展和设计友好的互连网络架构[1]。片上网络(NoC)是解决多核通信问题的一种方法。NoC的优点包括高带宽、低延迟、低功耗和可扩展性。互连架构对网络的点对点延迟、吞吐量和丢包率等性能有很大的影响。我们评估了三种NoC架构,包括环面、元立方体和超立方体在泊松和位补流量模式下的性能。考虑32、64、128、512和1024节点的网络大小。目标网络采用三种注入速率,范围为10% ~ 30%。性能评估表明,对于小型网络(32-64节点),环面是一个可行的选择,在中等负载下,对于128节点和512节点的网络,Metacube表现出与超立方体相似的性能。较低的链路复杂性和较少的长连线使Metacube成为超立方体的廉价替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信