Compressive Strength and Optimization of Concrete Produced by Replacing Cement with Coconut Shell Ash (CSA) and Groundnut Shell Ash (GSA)

Sidi Yusuf Abdurrahman, Bunyamin Ayodeji Olawumi, Yakubu Idris, Ashiru Mode, Mohammed Abdulmumin Nda
{"title":"Compressive Strength and Optimization of Concrete Produced by Replacing Cement with Coconut Shell Ash (CSA) and Groundnut Shell Ash (GSA)","authors":"Sidi Yusuf Abdurrahman, Bunyamin Ayodeji Olawumi, Yakubu Idris, Ashiru Mode, Mohammed Abdulmumin Nda","doi":"10.36348/sjce.2022.v06i08.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The compressive strength and optimization of concrete produced by replacing cement with CSA and GSA was conducted in this study. The materials used were cement, water, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, CSA, and GSA. The CSA and GSA replaced cement at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% in combination, with a total of seventy two (72) cubes cast, while the concrete compressive strength was determined after curing by complete immersion in water at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The modeling and optimization was done with the aid of design expert (version 13) software, while the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 23 and adopting the Least Square Difference (LSD) method. Results from the findings showed that the CSA used in the study is a good reactive pozzolana, and the GSA is not a reactive pozzolana. Also, the increase in CSA and GSA content in concrete reduces its workability, and concrete compressive strength. However, cement replaced with 5%CSA-0%GSA gave the optimum 28 days compressive strength which is not statistically significantly from the control concrete and can be used to produce concrete of compressive strength close to the control. Further findings from the regression model showed that CSA-GSA concrete compressive strength significantly fits a linear model and can be used to predict the 7, 14, 21, and 28 days compressive strength of CSA-GSA concrete, while the optimized result showed that CSA and GSA replacement of cement at 3.29% and 4.45% respectively yielded an optimum compressive strength of approximately 22.31N/mm2.","PeriodicalId":437137,"journal":{"name":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Saudi Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36348/sjce.2022.v06i08.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The compressive strength and optimization of concrete produced by replacing cement with CSA and GSA was conducted in this study. The materials used were cement, water, fine aggregate, coarse aggregate, CSA, and GSA. The CSA and GSA replaced cement at 5, 10, 15, 20, and 25% in combination, with a total of seventy two (72) cubes cast, while the concrete compressive strength was determined after curing by complete immersion in water at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The modeling and optimization was done with the aid of design expert (version 13) software, while the Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) version 23 and adopting the Least Square Difference (LSD) method. Results from the findings showed that the CSA used in the study is a good reactive pozzolana, and the GSA is not a reactive pozzolana. Also, the increase in CSA and GSA content in concrete reduces its workability, and concrete compressive strength. However, cement replaced with 5%CSA-0%GSA gave the optimum 28 days compressive strength which is not statistically significantly from the control concrete and can be used to produce concrete of compressive strength close to the control. Further findings from the regression model showed that CSA-GSA concrete compressive strength significantly fits a linear model and can be used to predict the 7, 14, 21, and 28 days compressive strength of CSA-GSA concrete, while the optimized result showed that CSA and GSA replacement of cement at 3.29% and 4.45% respectively yielded an optimum compressive strength of approximately 22.31N/mm2.
椰壳灰(CSA)和花生壳灰(GSA)替代水泥生产混凝土的抗压强度及优化
对CSA和GSA替代水泥生产的混凝土进行了抗压强度和优化研究。所用材料为水泥、水、细骨料、粗骨料、CSA和GSA。CSA和GSA分别以5%、10%、15%、20%和25%的比例替代水泥,共浇筑72(72)个立方体,而混凝土的抗压强度是在7、14、21和28天完全浸泡在水中养护后测定的。建模和优化使用design expert (version 13)软件,方差分析(ANOVA)使用SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences)第23版,采用最小二乘差分(LSD)方法。研究结果表明,CSA是一种良好的活性火山灰,而GSA不是一种活性火山灰。混凝土中CSA和GSA含量的增加降低了混凝土的和易性,降低了混凝土的抗压强度。然而,用5%CSA-0%GSA替代水泥的28天抗压强度与对照混凝土相比没有统计学上的显著差异,可以用来生产接近对照的抗压强度混凝土。回归模型进一步发现,CSA-GSA混凝土抗压强度显著拟合线性模型,可用于预测CSA-GSA混凝土的7、14、21和28天抗压强度,优化结果表明,CSA和GSA水泥替代量分别为3.29%和4.45%时,其最优抗压强度约为22.31N/mm2。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书