Plan Existence Verification as Symbolic Model Checking

Macilio da Silva Ferreira, Maria Viviane de Menezes, L. N. Barros
{"title":"Plan Existence Verification as Symbolic Model Checking","authors":"Macilio da Silva Ferreira, Maria Viviane de Menezes, L. N. Barros","doi":"10.5753/eniac.2018.4409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated Planning is the subarea of AI concerned with the generation of a plan of actions for an agent to achieve its goals. State-of-the-art planning algorithms are based on heuristic search. However, the inexistence of a plan can be a challenge for such planners, since they are not always able to discern the difficulty of finding a solution from its inexistence. The problem of plan existence verification, called planex, is computationally hard. Thus, in 2016, the planning community held for the first time the Unsolvability International Planning Competition (UIPC), which aims to evaluate algorithms on the task of verifying plan existence. The aim of this paper is to propose a new algorithm to solve the planex problem that is based on symbolic model checking approach. The proposed algorithm differs from others based on model checking in two points: (i) it is able to reason about the actions represented in PDDL (Planning Domain Description Language) and; (ii) it is based on the α-CTL logic, whose semantics takes into account the actions responsable for the state transitions. We also evaluate the proposed alorithm over the UIPC planning benchmark problems.","PeriodicalId":152292,"journal":{"name":"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anais do XV Encontro Nacional de Inteligência Artificial e Computacional (ENIAC 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5753/eniac.2018.4409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Automated Planning is the subarea of AI concerned with the generation of a plan of actions for an agent to achieve its goals. State-of-the-art planning algorithms are based on heuristic search. However, the inexistence of a plan can be a challenge for such planners, since they are not always able to discern the difficulty of finding a solution from its inexistence. The problem of plan existence verification, called planex, is computationally hard. Thus, in 2016, the planning community held for the first time the Unsolvability International Planning Competition (UIPC), which aims to evaluate algorithms on the task of verifying plan existence. The aim of this paper is to propose a new algorithm to solve the planex problem that is based on symbolic model checking approach. The proposed algorithm differs from others based on model checking in two points: (i) it is able to reason about the actions represented in PDDL (Planning Domain Description Language) and; (ii) it is based on the α-CTL logic, whose semantics takes into account the actions responsable for the state transitions. We also evaluate the proposed alorithm over the UIPC planning benchmark problems.
作为符号模型检查的计划存在性验证
自动规划是人工智能的一个子领域,涉及代理实现其目标的行动计划的生成。最先进的规划算法是基于启发式搜索。然而,计划的不存在对这些规划者来说可能是一个挑战,因为他们并不总是能够看出从计划的不存在中找到解决办法的困难。平面存在性验证问题(planex)在计算上是困难的。因此,在2016年,规划界首次举办了不可解性国际规划竞赛(UIPC),旨在评估验证计划存在性任务的算法。本文的目的是提出一种基于符号模型检验方法的求解平面问题的新算法。该算法与其他基于模型检查的算法有两点不同:(1)能够对PDDL (Planning Domain Description Language,规划领域描述语言)中表示的动作进行推理;(ii)它基于α-CTL逻辑,其语义考虑了负责状态转换的动作。我们还在UIPC规划基准问题上评估了所提出的算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信