Timeliness of financial reporting and audit committee effectiveness: evidence from UAE

Mohammed Ali Almuzaiqer
{"title":"Timeliness of financial reporting and audit committee effectiveness: evidence from UAE","authors":"Mohammed Ali Almuzaiqer","doi":"10.33736/URAF.931.2018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT \nPurpose – This study aims to examine the contemporary timeliness of financial reporting in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the impact of audit committee effectiveness on this timeliness. \nDesign/Methodology/Approach – Timeliness of financial reporting in this study is measured by audit report lag (ARL), which is the number of days between the date of the financial year end and the date of the audit report. The data from listed companies on the UAE capital markets; Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) and Dubai Financial Market (DFM), for three years from 2011 to 2013 resulted in 298 observations. The main statistical techniques of the study are means and multiple regressions. \nFindings – The findings show that generally all companies meet the submission deadlines imposed by the two UAE markets. Furthermore, ARL is influenced by audit committee size and profitability, while no evidence is found to support the effect of audit committee expertise, audit committee meetings and firm size on ARL. \nPractical Implications – The results of the study show that only audit committee size has a significant influence in reducing ARL. This may be attributed to having minimal variation in the implementation of the Code of Corporate Governance (CCG), particularly audit committee attributes, in the UAE. The results suggest that the current governance by audit committees is adequate to ensure that the financial reports of companies in the UAE are timely. However, except for audit committee size, the other audit committee attributes are unable to further shorten ARL. \n  \nOriginality/Value –The capital markets in the UAE and its CCG are relatively new. Hence, regulatory requirements may be less stringently implemented by companies in this country. Consequently, timely audited financial reports are demanded by local and international investors to make decisions and alleviate speculation. Thus, determining audit committee attributes that reduce ARL is beneficial to the UAE markets, the listed companies and investors.   \n  \nKeywords Audit report lag (ARL), Financial reporting timeliness, Audit committee, UAE \nPaper Type: Research paper","PeriodicalId":187805,"journal":{"name":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIMAS Review of Accounting and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33736/URAF.931.2018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

ABSTRACT Purpose – This study aims to examine the contemporary timeliness of financial reporting in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), and the impact of audit committee effectiveness on this timeliness. Design/Methodology/Approach – Timeliness of financial reporting in this study is measured by audit report lag (ARL), which is the number of days between the date of the financial year end and the date of the audit report. The data from listed companies on the UAE capital markets; Abu Dhabi Securities Exchange (ADX) and Dubai Financial Market (DFM), for three years from 2011 to 2013 resulted in 298 observations. The main statistical techniques of the study are means and multiple regressions. Findings – The findings show that generally all companies meet the submission deadlines imposed by the two UAE markets. Furthermore, ARL is influenced by audit committee size and profitability, while no evidence is found to support the effect of audit committee expertise, audit committee meetings and firm size on ARL. Practical Implications – The results of the study show that only audit committee size has a significant influence in reducing ARL. This may be attributed to having minimal variation in the implementation of the Code of Corporate Governance (CCG), particularly audit committee attributes, in the UAE. The results suggest that the current governance by audit committees is adequate to ensure that the financial reports of companies in the UAE are timely. However, except for audit committee size, the other audit committee attributes are unable to further shorten ARL.   Originality/Value –The capital markets in the UAE and its CCG are relatively new. Hence, regulatory requirements may be less stringently implemented by companies in this country. Consequently, timely audited financial reports are demanded by local and international investors to make decisions and alleviate speculation. Thus, determining audit committee attributes that reduce ARL is beneficial to the UAE markets, the listed companies and investors.     Keywords Audit report lag (ARL), Financial reporting timeliness, Audit committee, UAE Paper Type: Research paper
财务报告的及时性和审计委员会的有效性:来自阿联酋的证据
摘要目的:本研究旨在考察阿拉伯联合酋长国(UAE)财务报告的当代及时性,以及审计委员会有效性对这种及时性的影响。设计/方法/方法-本研究中财务报告的及时性通过审计报告滞后(ARL)来衡量,ARL是指财政年度结束日期与审计报告日期之间的天数。阿联酋资本市场上市公司数据;阿布扎比证券交易所(ADX)和迪拜金融市场(DFM),从2011年到2013年的三年,得出298条观察结果。本研究的主要统计技术是均值和多元回归。调查结果-调查结果显示,基本上所有公司都符合阿联酋两个市场规定的提交截止日期。此外,审计委员会规模和盈利能力对ARL有影响,而审计委员会专业知识、审计委员会会议和公司规模对ARL的影响没有证据支持。实际意义-研究结果显示,只有审计委员会的规模对减少ARL有显著影响。这可能是由于在阿联酋,公司治理准则(CCG)的实施变化很小,特别是审计委员会的属性。结果表明,目前审计委员会的治理足以确保阿联酋公司的财务报告是及时的。但是,除了审计委员会的规模之外,其他审计委员会的属性都无法进一步缩短ARL。创意/价值——阿联酋的资本市场及其CCG相对较新。因此,这个国家的公司执行监管要求可能不那么严格。因此,本地和国际投资者要求及时审计财务报告,以作出决策和减少投机。因此,确定审计委员会降低ARL的属性对阿联酋市场、上市公司和投资者都是有利的。关键词:审计报告滞后;财务报告及时性;审计委员会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信