The stigma experiences of INDIVIDUALS WITH COVID-19

Dicle ÖZCAN ELÇİ
{"title":"The stigma experiences of INDIVIDUALS WITH COVID-19","authors":"Dicle ÖZCAN ELÇİ","doi":"10.47138/jeaa.1037089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The subject of this study is the disease processes of adults over the age of eighteen who have had Covid-19 and their experiences of stigma/exclusion in this process. The aim of the study is to focus on whether the interviewed participants are faced with stigmatization practices arising from the disease, if they do, how stigma is interpreted by sick individuals and how they develop attitudes towards stigmatization practices. The study aims to respond to the gap in the literature that limits the relationship between Covid and stigma, especially in Turkey, from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Indeed, it focuses on the subjective, everyday experiences of people with different demographics who have experienced the disease. The study was completed through face-to-face in-depth interviews, which is one of the qualitative research techniques, with twenty-five adults over the age of eighteen, with an approach that includes phenomenological research, which is frequently used in qualitative research methods. In the study, a descriptive analysis technique based on theming and categorization was used as an analysis approach that is frequently used in qualitative research. At the end of the study, it was revealed that despite the risk of stigmatization, the participants shared their illness with their social circles with a sense of collective responsibility. Contrary to what was predicted, it is possible to say that stigma was not observed in all of the participants, and in this context, the experience of stigmatization in this participant profile was limited. The declared stigmatization aspects were defined as avoiding close physical contact after quarantine, using insulting language, avoiding being in the same environment, and making jokes related to the disease.","PeriodicalId":291636,"journal":{"name":"İktisadi ve İdari Yaklaşımlar Dergisi","volume":"218 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"İktisadi ve İdari Yaklaşımlar Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47138/jeaa.1037089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The subject of this study is the disease processes of adults over the age of eighteen who have had Covid-19 and their experiences of stigma/exclusion in this process. The aim of the study is to focus on whether the interviewed participants are faced with stigmatization practices arising from the disease, if they do, how stigma is interpreted by sick individuals and how they develop attitudes towards stigmatization practices. The study aims to respond to the gap in the literature that limits the relationship between Covid and stigma, especially in Turkey, from the perspective of healthcare professionals. Indeed, it focuses on the subjective, everyday experiences of people with different demographics who have experienced the disease. The study was completed through face-to-face in-depth interviews, which is one of the qualitative research techniques, with twenty-five adults over the age of eighteen, with an approach that includes phenomenological research, which is frequently used in qualitative research methods. In the study, a descriptive analysis technique based on theming and categorization was used as an analysis approach that is frequently used in qualitative research. At the end of the study, it was revealed that despite the risk of stigmatization, the participants shared their illness with their social circles with a sense of collective responsibility. Contrary to what was predicted, it is possible to say that stigma was not observed in all of the participants, and in this context, the experience of stigmatization in this participant profile was limited. The declared stigmatization aspects were defined as avoiding close physical contact after quarantine, using insulting language, avoiding being in the same environment, and making jokes related to the disease.
COVID-19患者的污名化经历
本研究的主题是18岁以上感染Covid-19的成年人的疾病过程及其在此过程中的耻辱/排斥经历。该研究的目的是关注受访的参与者是否面临由疾病引起的污名化做法,如果他们面临污名化做法,患者如何解释污名化,以及他们如何对污名化做法形成态度。该研究旨在从医疗保健专业人员的角度回应文献中的空白,这些空白限制了Covid与耻辱之间的关系,特别是在土耳其。事实上,它关注的是经历过这种疾病的不同人口统计学人群的主观日常经历。本研究采用质性研究方法之一的面对面深度访谈法,对25名18岁以上的成年人进行调查,并采用质性研究方法中常用的现象学研究方法。在研究中,基于主题和分类的描述性分析技术被用作定性研究中经常使用的分析方法。在研究结束时,研究人员发现,尽管有被污名化的风险,但参与者还是带着集体责任感与他们的社交圈分享了他们的疾病。与预测相反,可以说在所有参与者中都没有观察到耻辱感,在这种情况下,该参与者档案中的耻辱感经验是有限的。被宣布的污名化方面被定义为隔离后避免密切的身体接触,使用侮辱性语言,避免在同一环境中,以及与疾病有关的笑话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书