SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN PEMERINTAH DALAM PENGUKURAN KINERJA PEMERINTAHAN DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG

Yasmin Yasmin
{"title":"SISTEM PENGENDALIAN INTERN PEMERINTAH DALAM PENGUKURAN KINERJA PEMERINTAHAN DI KABUPATEN BANDUNG","authors":"Yasmin Yasmin","doi":"10.34204/JIAFE.V4I1.1081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper studies and analyzes the implementation of Internal Control System of Government (SPIP) related to performance in Bandung regency, especially at district level. Descriptive is used as a research method with a qualitative approach. The result of this research is SPIP implementation in sub-district limited to SPIP internalization in all work process in organization, through five elements that is controlling environment, risk assessment, controlling activity, information and communication, and monitoring. Control environment not yet supported by commitment from leaders and all apparatus which can be seen from evaluation result of performance accountability system of government institution at sub-district in Bandung regency with average score obtained in CC criteria. Evaluation is performed on five major components of performance management including: Performance planning, Performance measurement, Performance reporting, Performance evaluation and Achievement of organizational goals/ performance. From assessment result, internal evaluation component becomes the smallest scoring contributor with almost 40% sub-districts are in the range of 2.00 to 4.00. Therefore the study resulted in the conclusion of the lack of consistent internal control application by the sub-districts, thus the commitment and the role of sub-district leadership to increase the role of the team of SPIP that has been established in the district.","PeriodicalId":113166,"journal":{"name":"JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi)","volume":"56 57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JIAFE (Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34204/JIAFE.V4I1.1081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper studies and analyzes the implementation of Internal Control System of Government (SPIP) related to performance in Bandung regency, especially at district level. Descriptive is used as a research method with a qualitative approach. The result of this research is SPIP implementation in sub-district limited to SPIP internalization in all work process in organization, through five elements that is controlling environment, risk assessment, controlling activity, information and communication, and monitoring. Control environment not yet supported by commitment from leaders and all apparatus which can be seen from evaluation result of performance accountability system of government institution at sub-district in Bandung regency with average score obtained in CC criteria. Evaluation is performed on five major components of performance management including: Performance planning, Performance measurement, Performance reporting, Performance evaluation and Achievement of organizational goals/ performance. From assessment result, internal evaluation component becomes the smallest scoring contributor with almost 40% sub-districts are in the range of 2.00 to 4.00. Therefore the study resulted in the conclusion of the lack of consistent internal control application by the sub-districts, thus the commitment and the role of sub-district leadership to increase the role of the team of SPIP that has been established in the district.
政府内部控制系统在万隆区测量政府表现
本文研究和分析了万隆县政府内部控制系统(SPIP)的实施与绩效的关系,特别是在地区层面。描述性是用定性方法作为研究方法。通过控制环境、风险评估、控制活动、信息沟通和监控五个要素,将SPIP在组织的所有工作过程中内部化。控制环境尚未得到领导和所有机构的承诺支持,这可以从万隆县街道政府机构绩效问责制度的评估结果中看到,该评估结果在CC标准中获得平均分。评估是对绩效管理的五个主要组成部分进行的,包括:绩效计划、绩效测量、绩效报告、绩效评估和组织目标/绩效的实现。从评价结果来看,内部评价分量是得分贡献最小的,有近40%的街道在2.00 ~ 4.00之间。因此,研究得出的结论是,街道缺乏一致的内部控制应用,因此,街道领导的承诺和作用是增加在该地区建立的SPIP团队的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信