Product Reasoning Services: Economic Relevance and Architectural Approaches

Martin Hepp
{"title":"Product Reasoning Services: Economic Relevance and Architectural Approaches","authors":"Martin Hepp","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.457920","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Numerous business processes require reasoning about goods, services or delivery details. Reasoning is here used as a term for deriving new statements from an existing knowledge base. Examples of such reasoning tasks are the following queries: - Can product 1 be used as a substitute for product 2? - Does a specific product (described by unstructured text data or a vendor-specific number) belong to a given class of a classification system (eCl@ss, UN/SPSC,...)? More sophisticated reasoning could generate statements on transportation requirements or legal aspects. The crucial difference to a mere database query is that the desired answers are not explicitly stored in the system, but are derived from implicit knowledge in the knowledge base. Such reasoning engines will be important components of future eBusiness architectures. This is because for a huge set of transactions, computer systems require answers to such queries, in order to be able to perform the transaction autonomously. Of course, such reasoning engines can be part of the internal logic of appropriate eBusiness applications. There are, however, good reasons (e.g. incentive conflicts, reusability issues, and the need for global availability) to implement them as independent components of eBusiness architectures. For methods that need to be remotely invoked in a distributed environment, Web Services seem to become the architectural component of choice. It is thus reasonable to implement the respective reasoning engines as SOAP-based Web Services. The paper identifies appropriate reasoning services, discusses their internal structure, suggests suitable method calls and their parameters, and explains the implementation as a SOAP-based RPC-style Web Service.","PeriodicalId":147918,"journal":{"name":"Innovationen im E-Business","volume":"194 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Innovationen im E-Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.457920","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Numerous business processes require reasoning about goods, services or delivery details. Reasoning is here used as a term for deriving new statements from an existing knowledge base. Examples of such reasoning tasks are the following queries: - Can product 1 be used as a substitute for product 2? - Does a specific product (described by unstructured text data or a vendor-specific number) belong to a given class of a classification system (eCl@ss, UN/SPSC,...)? More sophisticated reasoning could generate statements on transportation requirements or legal aspects. The crucial difference to a mere database query is that the desired answers are not explicitly stored in the system, but are derived from implicit knowledge in the knowledge base. Such reasoning engines will be important components of future eBusiness architectures. This is because for a huge set of transactions, computer systems require answers to such queries, in order to be able to perform the transaction autonomously. Of course, such reasoning engines can be part of the internal logic of appropriate eBusiness applications. There are, however, good reasons (e.g. incentive conflicts, reusability issues, and the need for global availability) to implement them as independent components of eBusiness architectures. For methods that need to be remotely invoked in a distributed environment, Web Services seem to become the architectural component of choice. It is thus reasonable to implement the respective reasoning engines as SOAP-based Web Services. The paper identifies appropriate reasoning services, discusses their internal structure, suggests suitable method calls and their parameters, and explains the implementation as a SOAP-based RPC-style Web Service.
产品推理服务:经济相关性和架构方法
许多业务流程需要对商品、服务或交付细节进行推理。推理在这里用作从现有知识库派生新陈述的术语。此类推理任务的示例如下:—产品1可以用作产品2的替代品吗?-特定产品(由非结构化文本数据或供应商特定编号描述)是否属于分类系统(eCl@ss, UN/SPSC,…)的给定类别?更复杂的推理可以产生关于运输要求或法律方面的陈述。与单纯的数据库查询的关键区别在于,所需的答案没有显式地存储在系统中,而是从知识库中的隐性知识中派生出来的。这种推理引擎将成为未来电子商务架构的重要组成部分。这是因为对于大量的事务,计算机系统需要这些查询的答案,以便能够自主地执行事务。当然,这样的推理引擎可以是适当的电子商务应用程序的内部逻辑的一部分。然而,有很好的理由(例如,激励冲突、可重用性问题和对全局可用性的需求)将它们作为电子商务体系结构的独立组件来实现。对于需要在分布式环境中远程调用的方法,Web服务似乎成为了体系结构组件的首选。因此,将各自的推理引擎实现为基于soap的Web服务是合理的。本文确定了适当的推理服务,讨论了它们的内部结构,建议了合适的方法调用及其参数,并将其实现解释为基于soap的rpc样式的Web服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信