Algorithmic bias and the Value Sensitive Design approach

Judith Simon, Pak-Hang Wong, Gernot Rieder
{"title":"Algorithmic bias and the Value Sensitive Design approach","authors":"Judith Simon, Pak-Hang Wong, Gernot Rieder","doi":"10.14763/2020.4.1534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, amid growing awareness that computer algorithms are not neutral tools but can cause harm by reproducing and amplifying bias, attempts to detect and prevent such biases have intensified. An approach that has received considerable attention in this regard is the Value Sensitive Design (VSD) methodology, which aims to contribute to both the critical analysis of (dis)values in existing technologies and the construction of novel technologies that account for specific desired values. This article provides a brief overview of the key features of the Value Sensitive Design approach, examines its contributions to understanding and addressing issues around bias in computer systems, outlines the current debates on algorithmic bias and fairness in machine learning, and discusses how such debates could profit from VSD-derived insights and recommendations. Relating these debates on values in design and algorithmic bias to research on cognitive biases, we conclude by stressing our collective duty to not only detect and counter biases in software systems, but to also address and remedy their societal origins. Issue 4 This article belongs to Concepts of the digital society, a special section of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Christian Katzenbach and Thomas Christian Bächle.","PeriodicalId":219999,"journal":{"name":"Internet Policy Rev.","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internet Policy Rev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14763/2020.4.1534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

Recently, amid growing awareness that computer algorithms are not neutral tools but can cause harm by reproducing and amplifying bias, attempts to detect and prevent such biases have intensified. An approach that has received considerable attention in this regard is the Value Sensitive Design (VSD) methodology, which aims to contribute to both the critical analysis of (dis)values in existing technologies and the construction of novel technologies that account for specific desired values. This article provides a brief overview of the key features of the Value Sensitive Design approach, examines its contributions to understanding and addressing issues around bias in computer systems, outlines the current debates on algorithmic bias and fairness in machine learning, and discusses how such debates could profit from VSD-derived insights and recommendations. Relating these debates on values in design and algorithmic bias to research on cognitive biases, we conclude by stressing our collective duty to not only detect and counter biases in software systems, but to also address and remedy their societal origins. Issue 4 This article belongs to Concepts of the digital society, a special section of Internet Policy Review guest-edited by Christian Katzenbach and Thomas Christian Bächle.
算法偏差和值敏感设计方法
最近,随着人们越来越意识到计算机算法不是中立的工具,而是可能通过复制和放大偏见而造成伤害,检测和防止这种偏见的努力已经加强。在这方面受到相当关注的一种方法是价值敏感设计(VSD)方法,其目的是对现有技术中的(dis)值进行批判性分析,并构建能够解释特定期望值的新技术。本文简要概述了价值敏感设计方法的主要特征,考察了其对理解和解决计算机系统中偏见问题的贡献,概述了当前关于机器学习中算法偏见和公平性的辩论,并讨论了这些辩论如何从vsd衍生的见解和建议中受益。将这些关于设计价值和算法偏差的争论与认知偏差的研究联系起来,我们最后强调我们的集体责任,不仅要检测和对抗软件系统中的偏差,还要解决和纠正它们的社会根源。本文隶属于《互联网政策评论》特约栏目《数字社会的概念》,由Christian Katzenbach和Thomas Christian编辑Bächle。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信