Analysis of the Republic of South Sudan's Accession to the East African Community: Benefits, Detriments and Recommendations

L. N. Beny, Matthew L. A. Snyder
{"title":"Analysis of the Republic of South Sudan's Accession to the East African Community: Benefits, Detriments and Recommendations","authors":"L. N. Beny, Matthew L. A. Snyder","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2293138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accession to the East African Community (\"EAC\") offers many potential benefits for the Republic of South Sudan. For instance, access to ports in Kenya and regional transportation corridors could increase the competitiveness of South Sudanese products. EAC membership could also open up new regional and international markets for South Sudanese products and strengthen South Sudan's negotiating position vis-a-vis non-EAC countries. Moreover, EAC membership may result in knowledge transfer between EAC partner states and increased regional investment. This in turn could promote the development of better domestic infrastructure and generate significant welfare gains. South Sudanese participation in non-economic EAC cooperation programs could also enhance regional security, food security, and natural resource management.But EAC membership could also have detrimental effects. EAC members are expected to implement a variety of economic and non-economic programs, not all of which may be in South Sudan's interest. For instance, EAC policies like common external tariffs (\"CETs\") and common investment rules could constrain South Sudan's ability to implement trade and investment promotion policies. In addition, EAC membership may hurt South Sudanese consumers and entrepreneurs through elevated CETs on consumer goods and exposure to regional competition. Additionally, continued use of non-tariff barriers and political resistance in EAC partner states may prevent full realization of the potential positive benefits of EAC membership. Lastly, as seen in the case of the EAC-EU Economic Partnership Agreement, EAC membership could require South Sudan to make trade concessions to non-EAC countries.As South Sudan appears committed to pursuing EAC membership, it is now necessary to develop a considered negotiation strategy to maximize the potential benefits of integration and mitigate its negative effects. As demonstrated by the Rwanda case study in Part III, this strategy can be implemented through a multi-step process that focuses on determining the positive and negative impact of EAC membership on South Sudan's development and economy, educating local stakeholders, strengthening vulnerable sectors, and mitigating the negative effects of integration.","PeriodicalId":320446,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Regional Arrangements (Topic)","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Regional Arrangements (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2293138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accession to the East African Community ("EAC") offers many potential benefits for the Republic of South Sudan. For instance, access to ports in Kenya and regional transportation corridors could increase the competitiveness of South Sudanese products. EAC membership could also open up new regional and international markets for South Sudanese products and strengthen South Sudan's negotiating position vis-a-vis non-EAC countries. Moreover, EAC membership may result in knowledge transfer between EAC partner states and increased regional investment. This in turn could promote the development of better domestic infrastructure and generate significant welfare gains. South Sudanese participation in non-economic EAC cooperation programs could also enhance regional security, food security, and natural resource management.But EAC membership could also have detrimental effects. EAC members are expected to implement a variety of economic and non-economic programs, not all of which may be in South Sudan's interest. For instance, EAC policies like common external tariffs ("CETs") and common investment rules could constrain South Sudan's ability to implement trade and investment promotion policies. In addition, EAC membership may hurt South Sudanese consumers and entrepreneurs through elevated CETs on consumer goods and exposure to regional competition. Additionally, continued use of non-tariff barriers and political resistance in EAC partner states may prevent full realization of the potential positive benefits of EAC membership. Lastly, as seen in the case of the EAC-EU Economic Partnership Agreement, EAC membership could require South Sudan to make trade concessions to non-EAC countries.As South Sudan appears committed to pursuing EAC membership, it is now necessary to develop a considered negotiation strategy to maximize the potential benefits of integration and mitigate its negative effects. As demonstrated by the Rwanda case study in Part III, this strategy can be implemented through a multi-step process that focuses on determining the positive and negative impact of EAC membership on South Sudan's development and economy, educating local stakeholders, strengthening vulnerable sectors, and mitigating the negative effects of integration.
南苏丹共和国加入东非共同体分析:利、弊和建议
加入东非共同体(EAC)为南苏丹共和国提供了许多潜在的好处。例如,进入肯尼亚港口和区域运输走廊可以提高南苏丹产品的竞争力。加入东非共同体还可以为南苏丹的产品开辟新的区域和国际市场,并加强南苏丹与非东非共同体国家的谈判地位。此外,EAC的成员资格可能导致EAC伙伴国之间的知识转移,并增加区域投资。这反过来又可以促进发展更好的国内基础设施,并产生显著的福利收益。南苏丹参与东非共同体的非经济合作项目也可以加强地区安全、粮食安全和自然资源管理。但EAC的成员资格也可能产生不利影响。预计东非共同体成员国将实施各种经济和非经济计划,但并非所有计划都符合南苏丹的利益。例如,共同对外关税(CETs)和共同投资规则等东非共同体政策可能会限制南苏丹实施贸易和投资促进政策的能力。此外,东非经济共同体的成员资格可能会通过提高消费品的关税和暴露于区域竞争而损害南苏丹的消费者和企业家。此外,继续使用非关税壁垒和在EAC伙伴国的政治阻力可能会阻止充分实现EAC成员资格的潜在积极利益。最后,正如《东非共同体-欧盟经济伙伴关系协定》所示,东非共同体的成员资格可能要求南苏丹对非东非共同体国家做出贸易让步。由于南苏丹似乎决心加入东非共同体,现在有必要制定一项经过深思熟虑的谈判策略,以最大限度地发挥一体化的潜在好处,并减轻其负面影响。正如第三部分中的卢旺达案例研究所表明的那样,该战略可以通过一个多步骤的过程来实施,重点是确定东非共同体成员身份对南苏丹发展和经济的积极和消极影响,教育当地利益相关者,加强弱势部门,减轻一体化的负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信