Validation of a motion capture suit for clinical gait analysis

S. Hellmers, Sebastian J. F. Fudickar, Eugen Lange, Christian Lins, A. Hein
{"title":"Validation of a motion capture suit for clinical gait analysis","authors":"S. Hellmers, Sebastian J. F. Fudickar, Eugen Lange, Christian Lins, A. Hein","doi":"10.1145/3154862.3154884","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Gait analysis is often supported by technology. Due to limitations in optical systems, such as limited measurement volumes and the requirement of a laboratory environment, low-cost inertial measurement unit (IMU) based motion capture systems might be better suited for gait analysis since they involve no spatial limitations and are flexibly applicable. In this paper, we investigate if low-cost IMU-based motion capture suits are an adequate alternative for clinical gait analysis in terms of accuracy of the determination of joint flexions and gait parameters. For this reason, we developed a gait analysis system and a gait analysis algorithm, which detects joint positions based on the Joint Coordinate System and determines knee, hip, and ankle flexions, as well as spatiotemporal parameters such as the number of steps, cadence, step duration and step length, and the specific gait phases. We evaluated and validated the IMU-based system in comparison to camera-based measurements (as gold standard) with three different healthy adult subjects. The evaluation indicates that the full-body motion capture system achieves a high degree of precision (0.86) and recall (0.98) in the recognition of gait cycles. The harmonic mean F0.15 of the two factors precision and recall is on average 0.96 and the mentioned temporal gait parameters can be determined with an error below 10 ms. The mean deviation in the determination of joint angles amounts 1.35° ± 2°. Consequently, the article at hand indicates that low-cost IMU-based motion capture suits are an accurate alternative for gait analysis.","PeriodicalId":200810,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","volume":"127 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 11th EAI International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3154862.3154884","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Gait analysis is often supported by technology. Due to limitations in optical systems, such as limited measurement volumes and the requirement of a laboratory environment, low-cost inertial measurement unit (IMU) based motion capture systems might be better suited for gait analysis since they involve no spatial limitations and are flexibly applicable. In this paper, we investigate if low-cost IMU-based motion capture suits are an adequate alternative for clinical gait analysis in terms of accuracy of the determination of joint flexions and gait parameters. For this reason, we developed a gait analysis system and a gait analysis algorithm, which detects joint positions based on the Joint Coordinate System and determines knee, hip, and ankle flexions, as well as spatiotemporal parameters such as the number of steps, cadence, step duration and step length, and the specific gait phases. We evaluated and validated the IMU-based system in comparison to camera-based measurements (as gold standard) with three different healthy adult subjects. The evaluation indicates that the full-body motion capture system achieves a high degree of precision (0.86) and recall (0.98) in the recognition of gait cycles. The harmonic mean F0.15 of the two factors precision and recall is on average 0.96 and the mentioned temporal gait parameters can be determined with an error below 10 ms. The mean deviation in the determination of joint angles amounts 1.35° ± 2°. Consequently, the article at hand indicates that low-cost IMU-based motion capture suits are an accurate alternative for gait analysis.
用于临床步态分析的动作捕捉套装的验证
步态分析经常得到技术的支持。由于光学系统的局限性,例如有限的测量体积和实验室环境的要求,基于低成本惯性测量单元(IMU)的运动捕捉系统可能更适合步态分析,因为它们没有空间限制,并且灵活适用。在本文中,我们研究了低成本的基于imu的运动捕捉服在确定关节屈曲和步态参数的准确性方面是否适合临床步态分析。为此,我们开发了步态分析系统和步态分析算法,该系统基于关节坐标系检测关节位置,确定膝关节、髋关节和踝关节的屈曲,以及步数、节奏、步数、步长等时空参数,以及特定的步态阶段。我们在三个不同的健康成人受试者中评估并验证了基于imu的系统与基于相机的测量(作为金标准)。评估结果表明,该系统在步态周期识别方面具有较高的精度(0.86)和召回率(0.98)。精度和召回率两个因素的谐波平均值F0.15平均为0.96,所述时间步态参数的确定误差小于10 ms。测定关节角的平均偏差为1.35°±2°。因此,这篇文章表明,低成本的基于imu的动作捕捉套装是步态分析的准确选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信