Reform or abolition? Using popular mobilisations to dismantle the ‘prisonindustrial complex’

J. Sudbury
{"title":"Reform or abolition? Using popular mobilisations to dismantle the ‘prisonindustrial complex’","authors":"J. Sudbury","doi":"10.1080/09627251.2015.1143627","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In April 2009, California officials unveiled historic plans to cut $400 million from the state's $9.8 billion corrections budget by reducing the prison population by 8,000. With half the reductions coming from changes in parole policy that would reduce the revolving door of parolees being returned on technical violations, and the other half from changes in the treatment of property crimes and enhanced credits for prisoners attending education programmes, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation effectively adopted part of a larger plan created by Californians United for a Responsible Budget, a lobby group made up of 43 prison abolitionist, reform and social justice organisations. This temporary alignment between anti-prison activists and one of the nation's largest and most powerful correctional departments is a dramatic shift from a political terrain in which activists have relied on direct action, mass protests and lawsuits to block state officials bent on inexorable prison expansion. I want to argue that the grassroots tactics used by the antiprison movement over the past decade to transform popular understandings of mass incarceration have opened up the door to new political possibilities at a time of economic crisis. Where prisons were once seen as a recession-proof inevitability, the anti-prison movement has created a chink in the armour that may be the first step in ending America's over-reliance on imprisonment as a solution to deep-rooted social problems.","PeriodicalId":432339,"journal":{"name":"Criminal Justice Matters","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Criminal Justice Matters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09627251.2015.1143627","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

In April 2009, California officials unveiled historic plans to cut $400 million from the state's $9.8 billion corrections budget by reducing the prison population by 8,000. With half the reductions coming from changes in parole policy that would reduce the revolving door of parolees being returned on technical violations, and the other half from changes in the treatment of property crimes and enhanced credits for prisoners attending education programmes, the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation effectively adopted part of a larger plan created by Californians United for a Responsible Budget, a lobby group made up of 43 prison abolitionist, reform and social justice organisations. This temporary alignment between anti-prison activists and one of the nation's largest and most powerful correctional departments is a dramatic shift from a political terrain in which activists have relied on direct action, mass protests and lawsuits to block state officials bent on inexorable prison expansion. I want to argue that the grassroots tactics used by the antiprison movement over the past decade to transform popular understandings of mass incarceration have opened up the door to new political possibilities at a time of economic crisis. Where prisons were once seen as a recession-proof inevitability, the anti-prison movement has created a chink in the armour that may be the first step in ending America's over-reliance on imprisonment as a solution to deep-rooted social problems.
改革还是废除?利用民众动员拆除“监狱工业综合体”
2009年4月,加州官员公布了一项历史性计划,通过减少8000名囚犯,从该州98亿美元的惩戒预算中削减4亿美元。一半的减少来自于假释政策的改变,这将减少假释犯因技术违法而被遣返的可能性,另一半来自于财产犯罪处理方式的改变,以及对参加教育项目的囚犯增加学分。加州矫正和康复部有效地采用了加州负责任预算联合组织(California’s United for a Responsible Budget)制定的一项更大计划的一部分,这是一个由43名监狱废除主义者组成的游说团体。改革和社会正义组织。反监狱活动人士与美国规模最大、权力最大的惩教部门之一的临时结盟,标志着政治格局的巨大转变。在过去,活动人士一直依靠直接行动、大规模抗议和诉讼来阻止州政府官员决意无情地扩大监狱规模。我想说的是,在过去的十年里,反监狱运动所使用的草根策略改变了大众对大规模监禁的理解,在经济危机时期为新的政治可能性打开了一扇门。监狱一度被认为是经济衰退的必然结果,而反监狱运动在美国的盔甲上创造了一个裂缝,这可能是结束美国过度依赖监禁作为解决根深蒂固的社会问题的第一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信