How socially cohesive was New Zealand’s first lockdown period from the perspective of culturally diverse older New Zealanders?

Tessa Morgan, Anne Koh, Stella Black, Elizabeth Fanueli, T. Moeke-Maxwell, Jing Xu, Hetty Goodwin, L. Williams, J. Wiles, M. Gott
{"title":"How socially cohesive was New Zealand’s first lockdown period from the perspective of culturally diverse older New Zealanders?","authors":"Tessa Morgan, Anne Koh, Stella Black, Elizabeth Fanueli, T. Moeke-Maxwell, Jing Xu, Hetty Goodwin, L. Williams, J. Wiles, M. Gott","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2022.2056061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n Aotearoa, New Zealand’s (NZ) initial pandemic response has been held up internationally as a model of social cohesion and compassion, made salient by the ‘team of five million’ messaging promoted by the New Zealand government. This paper considers whether the first New Zealand COVID-19 lockdown was viewed and experienced as socially cohesive from the perspective of diverse older New Zealanders. This study presents a deductive analysis based on 44 individual or group interviews with Māori, Pacific, Chinese, Korean and New Zealand European (NZE) people aged 60 and over. This paper presents a critical, intersectional discussion around social cohesion experienced by older New Zealanders during lockdown, by considering their views and experiences of belongingness, legitimacy, recognition, inclusion and participation. We suggest that New Zealand European participants benefited most from national appeals for solidarity and reported enhanced feelings of belongingness and inclusion. Māori, Chinese, Korean and Pacific experienced belongingness and inclusion primarily on a community level owing to the culturally-specific support they received. We conclude that future pandemic planning should aim to strengthen targeted culturally-specific community initiatives already in action whilst improving aspects of inclusion and participation for all older New Zealanders.","PeriodicalId":308502,"journal":{"name":"Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kōtuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2022.2056061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Aotearoa, New Zealand’s (NZ) initial pandemic response has been held up internationally as a model of social cohesion and compassion, made salient by the ‘team of five million’ messaging promoted by the New Zealand government. This paper considers whether the first New Zealand COVID-19 lockdown was viewed and experienced as socially cohesive from the perspective of diverse older New Zealanders. This study presents a deductive analysis based on 44 individual or group interviews with Māori, Pacific, Chinese, Korean and New Zealand European (NZE) people aged 60 and over. This paper presents a critical, intersectional discussion around social cohesion experienced by older New Zealanders during lockdown, by considering their views and experiences of belongingness, legitimacy, recognition, inclusion and participation. We suggest that New Zealand European participants benefited most from national appeals for solidarity and reported enhanced feelings of belongingness and inclusion. Māori, Chinese, Korean and Pacific experienced belongingness and inclusion primarily on a community level owing to the culturally-specific support they received. We conclude that future pandemic planning should aim to strengthen targeted culturally-specific community initiatives already in action whilst improving aspects of inclusion and participation for all older New Zealanders.
从文化多样化的新西兰老年人的角度来看,新西兰第一次封锁期间的社会凝聚力如何?
新西兰(NZ)最初的大流行应对措施在国际上被视为社会凝聚力和同情心的典范,新西兰政府倡导的“500万团队”信息突出了这一点。本文从不同的新西兰老年人的角度考虑,新西兰第一次COVID-19封锁是否被视为和经历了社会凝聚力。本研究基于对Māori、太平洋、中国、韩国和新西兰60岁及以上欧洲人(NZE)的44位个人或团体访谈进行了演绎分析。本文通过考虑新西兰老年人在归属感、合法性、认可、包容和参与方面的观点和经历,围绕他们在封锁期间经历的社会凝聚力进行了批判性、交叉性的讨论。我们认为,新西兰的欧洲参与者从国家团结呼吁中获益最多,并报告了归属感和包容性的增强。Māori、中国人、韩国人和太平洋人主要在社区层面体验到归属感和包容性,因为他们得到了特定文化的支持。我们的结论是,未来的流行病规划应旨在加强已有的针对特定文化的社区倡议,同时改善所有新西兰老年人的包容和参与方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书