An Academic Model for Building Effective Faculty Teams to Promote Excellence in Nursing Education

Sally Cantwell, M. Norton, Valerie J. Gooder, Susan B. Thornock
{"title":"An Academic Model for Building Effective Faculty Teams to Promote Excellence in Nursing Education","authors":"Sally Cantwell, M. Norton, Valerie J. Gooder, Susan B. Thornock","doi":"10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As a result of the national movement to advance nurses at the doctoral level, and the concurrent shortage of nursing faculty, the role of the DNP prepared nurse in the academic setting continues to evolve. At our School of Nursing, the need to define, understand and utilize the various faculty roles led to the development and implementation of an Academic Model for Nursing Education. This mixed-method research study was conducted to identify the factors that contribute to an effective culture in academia. The findings from the survey and focus groups indicated our model had a positive association on instructional design, teaching, administrative processes, adjustments of college tenure and promotion, clinical partnerships, shared faculty teaching loads, and succession planning. Focus group findings included the unanticipated benefits of improved faculty engagement, empowerment, collaboration, and faculty mentoring. Our academic practice model is reflective of the changes already occurring in collaborative clinical pathways in healthcare systems. The expected benefits of our academic practice model and those occurring in healthcare share comparable outcomes. These may include improving nursing scholarship, patient and student outcomes, strengthening the position of nursing in organizations and the broader community through enhanced leadership, providing parity with other healthcare disciplines, and improving the overall image of nursing [1]. Our Academic Model for Nursing Education is reflective of current healthcare practices, addresses the nurse faculty shortage while promoting faculty collaboration and job satisfaction.","PeriodicalId":344042,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nursing Science","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajns.20200905.21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As a result of the national movement to advance nurses at the doctoral level, and the concurrent shortage of nursing faculty, the role of the DNP prepared nurse in the academic setting continues to evolve. At our School of Nursing, the need to define, understand and utilize the various faculty roles led to the development and implementation of an Academic Model for Nursing Education. This mixed-method research study was conducted to identify the factors that contribute to an effective culture in academia. The findings from the survey and focus groups indicated our model had a positive association on instructional design, teaching, administrative processes, adjustments of college tenure and promotion, clinical partnerships, shared faculty teaching loads, and succession planning. Focus group findings included the unanticipated benefits of improved faculty engagement, empowerment, collaboration, and faculty mentoring. Our academic practice model is reflective of the changes already occurring in collaborative clinical pathways in healthcare systems. The expected benefits of our academic practice model and those occurring in healthcare share comparable outcomes. These may include improving nursing scholarship, patient and student outcomes, strengthening the position of nursing in organizations and the broader community through enhanced leadership, providing parity with other healthcare disciplines, and improving the overall image of nursing [1]. Our Academic Model for Nursing Education is reflective of current healthcare practices, addresses the nurse faculty shortage while promoting faculty collaboration and job satisfaction.
建立有效师资团队促进护理教育卓越的学术模式
由于全国运动的结果是提高护士的博士水平,同时护理教师的短缺,DNP准备护士在学术环境中的作用继续发展。在我们的护理学院,定义、理解和利用各种教师角色的需要导致了护理教育学术模式的发展和实施。这项混合方法的研究是为了确定在学术界有效文化的因素。调查和焦点小组的结果表明,我们的模式在教学设计、教学、行政流程、大学任期和晋升的调整、临床伙伴关系、教师教学负荷分担和继任计划方面具有正相关。焦点小组的发现包括改善教师参与、授权、协作和教师指导的意想不到的好处。我们的学术实践模型反映了医疗系统中协作临床途径已经发生的变化。我们的学术实践模式的预期收益和医疗保健领域的预期收益具有可比性。这些可能包括改善护理奖学金,患者和学生的结果,通过加强领导加强护理在组织和更广泛社区中的地位,提供与其他医疗保健学科的平等,以及改善护理的整体形象[1]。我们的护理教育学术模式反映了当前的医疗保健实践,解决了护士师资短缺的问题,同时促进了教师合作和工作满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信