Benefits of Clearing Capacity Markets in Short Term Horizon: The Case of Germany

A. Sadeghi, S. S. Torbaghan, M. Gibescu
{"title":"Benefits of Clearing Capacity Markets in Short Term Horizon: The Case of Germany","authors":"A. Sadeghi, S. S. Torbaghan, M. Gibescu","doi":"10.1109/EEM.2018.8469979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms are widely accepted mechanisms to ensure adequate supply capacity for electrical energy systems. Most capacity market designs are focused on long term horizons. We develop an optimization-based framework for clearing the capacity market over a short-term horizon. Participation strategy for generation units with firm capacity based on long-run marginal pricing is analyzed. Based on a German case study, we compare three different market frameworks: a proposed short-term capacity clearing process, a long-term capacity clearing process, and an electricity-only market. Results show that, under perfect competition assumptions, generation units that are necessary to maintain the level of supply adequacy deemed by the TSO, are able to recover their total costs under both short-term and long-term clearing, while the energy-only approach cannot ensure long-term supply adequacy. We also show that clearing the capacity market in short term horizons will decrease the cost of ensuring adequate supply by about 28 %.","PeriodicalId":334674,"journal":{"name":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 15th International Conference on the European Energy Market (EEM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EEM.2018.8469979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Capacity Remuneration Mechanisms are widely accepted mechanisms to ensure adequate supply capacity for electrical energy systems. Most capacity market designs are focused on long term horizons. We develop an optimization-based framework for clearing the capacity market over a short-term horizon. Participation strategy for generation units with firm capacity based on long-run marginal pricing is analyzed. Based on a German case study, we compare three different market frameworks: a proposed short-term capacity clearing process, a long-term capacity clearing process, and an electricity-only market. Results show that, under perfect competition assumptions, generation units that are necessary to maintain the level of supply adequacy deemed by the TSO, are able to recover their total costs under both short-term and long-term clearing, while the energy-only approach cannot ensure long-term supply adequacy. We also show that clearing the capacity market in short term horizons will decrease the cost of ensuring adequate supply by about 28 %.
短期内清算能力市场的好处:以德国为例
容量补偿机制是广泛接受的机制,以确保电力系统有足够的供应能力。大多数容量市场设计都着眼于长期前景。我们开发了一个基于优化的框架,以便在短期内清理产能市场。分析了基于长期边际定价的发电机组参与策略。基于德国的案例研究,我们比较了三种不同的市场框架:拟议的短期容量清算过程,长期容量清算过程和仅限电力的市场。结果表明,在完全竞争假设下,发电机组在短期和长期清仓下都能够收回其总成本,而仅限能源的方法不能保证长期的供应充足。我们还表明,在短期内清理产能市场将使确保充足供应的成本降低约28%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信