{"title":"Gender classification with support vector machines","authors":"B. Moghaddam, Ming-Hsuan Yang","doi":"10.1109/AFGR.2000.840651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Support vector machines (SVM) are investigated for visual gender classification with low-resolution \"thumbnail\" faces (21-by-12 pixels) processed from 1755 images from the FERET face database. The performance of SVM (3.4% error) is shown to be superior to traditional pattern classifiers (linear, quadratic, Fisher linear discriminant, nearest-neighbor) as well as more modern techniques such as radial basis function (RBF) classifiers and large ensemble-RBF networks. SVM also out-performed human test subjects at the same task: in a perception study with 30 human test subjects, ranging in age from mid-20s to mid-40s, the average error rate was found to be 32% for the \"thumbnails\" and 6.7% with higher resolution images. The difference in performance between low- and high-resolution tests with SVM was only 1%, demonstrating robustness and relative scale invariance for visual classification.","PeriodicalId":360065,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (Cat. No. PR00580)","volume":"100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"330","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (Cat. No. PR00580)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AFGR.2000.840651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 330
Abstract
Support vector machines (SVM) are investigated for visual gender classification with low-resolution "thumbnail" faces (21-by-12 pixels) processed from 1755 images from the FERET face database. The performance of SVM (3.4% error) is shown to be superior to traditional pattern classifiers (linear, quadratic, Fisher linear discriminant, nearest-neighbor) as well as more modern techniques such as radial basis function (RBF) classifiers and large ensemble-RBF networks. SVM also out-performed human test subjects at the same task: in a perception study with 30 human test subjects, ranging in age from mid-20s to mid-40s, the average error rate was found to be 32% for the "thumbnails" and 6.7% with higher resolution images. The difference in performance between low- and high-resolution tests with SVM was only 1%, demonstrating robustness and relative scale invariance for visual classification.