¿DE QUÉ HABLAMOS LOS HISTORIADORES DEL DERECHO CUANDO HABLAMOS DE DERECHO?

C. Garriga
{"title":"¿DE QUÉ HABLAMOS LOS HISTORIADORES DEL DERECHO CUANDO HABLAMOS DE DERECHO?","authors":"C. Garriga","doi":"10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v14n113329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"LAW? ABSTRACT: Building on the development of critical legal history begun in the 1980’s as a radical alternative to traditional historiography, this essay reflects the decisive role that our conceptualization of law has on our “historian’s rep-resentation” of what counts as law in each case. Against this background, this article proposes an approach to the law as a dimension of culture, foreign to any apriorism, and identifies the main theoretical challenges that this poses to the current situation faced by legal historiography – characterized by the dialectic between globalization and localization.","PeriodicalId":321368,"journal":{"name":"Revista Direito Mackenzie","volume":"153 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Direito Mackenzie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/2317-2622/direitomackenzie.v14n113329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

LAW? ABSTRACT: Building on the development of critical legal history begun in the 1980’s as a radical alternative to traditional historiography, this essay reflects the decisive role that our conceptualization of law has on our “historian’s rep-resentation” of what counts as law in each case. Against this background, this article proposes an approach to the law as a dimension of culture, foreign to any apriorism, and identifies the main theoretical challenges that this poses to the current situation faced by legal historiography – characterized by the dialectic between globalization and localization.
当我们谈论法律时,法律历史学家谈论的是什么?
法律?摘要:20世纪80年代兴起的批判性法律史是对传统史学的一种激进的替代,在此基础上,本文反映了我们对法律的概念化对我们在每个案例中作为法律的“历史学家再现”所起的决定性作用。在此背景下,本文提出了一种不同于任何先验主义的文化维度的法律研究方法,并指出了这种方法对法律史学面临的现状构成的主要理论挑战——其特征是全球化与本土化之间的辩证关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信