Foreign Affairs and War

M. W. McConnell
{"title":"Foreign Affairs and War","authors":"M. W. McConnell","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter reviews the king's powers of peace and war as of 1787, which included the power to make war, declare war, command troops and the Navy during war, summon and employ the militia, and erect forts and other military installations. It recalls Charles Pinckney, who warned that the Convention was creating an elective monarchy. It also discusses how the Convention vested the bulk of the war and foreign affairs powers in Congress and the Senate, except the executive, and how the presidency gained most of its foreign affairs authority only toward the end of the Convention. The chapter cites the king's prerogative power over foreign affairs that was absolute, at least in theory, under the post-1688 settlement. It talks about the Confederation Congress that typically issued detailed instructions to its envoys regarding what positions to take on behalf of the United States, suggesting that the power to send ambassadors included the power to instruct them.","PeriodicalId":252767,"journal":{"name":"The President Who Would Not Be King","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The President Who Would Not Be King","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11hprfg.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter reviews the king's powers of peace and war as of 1787, which included the power to make war, declare war, command troops and the Navy during war, summon and employ the militia, and erect forts and other military installations. It recalls Charles Pinckney, who warned that the Convention was creating an elective monarchy. It also discusses how the Convention vested the bulk of the war and foreign affairs powers in Congress and the Senate, except the executive, and how the presidency gained most of its foreign affairs authority only toward the end of the Convention. The chapter cites the king's prerogative power over foreign affairs that was absolute, at least in theory, under the post-1688 settlement. It talks about the Confederation Congress that typically issued detailed instructions to its envoys regarding what positions to take on behalf of the United States, suggesting that the power to send ambassadors included the power to instruct them.
外交与战争
本章回顾了1787年国王的和平与战争权,包括发动战争、宣战、战时指挥军队和海军、召集和雇用民兵、建立堡垒和其他军事设施的权力。这让人想起查尔斯·平克尼,他警告说,国民公会正在创造一个选举君主制。它还讨论了公约如何将大部分战争和外交事务权力授予国会和参议院,除了行政权力,以及总统如何在公约结束时才获得大部分外交事务权力。这一章引用了国王在外交事务上的绝对特权,至少在理论上,在1688年后的和解中。它谈到邦联国会通常会向其特使发布详细的指示,说明代表美国采取何种立场,这表明派遣大使的权力包括指示他们的权力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信