Can knowledge qua knowledge be a virtue?

Ayelet Even-Ezra
{"title":"Can knowledge qua knowledge be a virtue?","authors":"Ayelet Even-Ezra","doi":"10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some theologians defined Paul's cognition during his trance as purely intellectual and unmatched by the same degree of love, contrasting it to another form of cognition, which engages the affective part of the soul. Chapter 6 examines this dichotomy, thereby examining the moral aspects of knowledge in scholastic society and thought. A comparative investigation of questions concerning the meritorious value of prophecy and other modes of knowledge reveals the formulation of a new concept of grace: grace of a type that does not make one worthy for salvation and may well reside in a sinner. The prominent examples of such grace were the pure intellectual talent of pagans or sinners and the charisma of gifted preachers. A dominant metaphor for sterile knowledge was of “remaining standing in the truth, without moving further to the good deed” (which is like knowing you must go the gym—but remaining on the sofa). These and related theoretical discussions lead to a discussion of charisma, ethic in the academic sphere, and the value of personal example in teaching within the newly-formed institution and to reflections about the internal search for truth and the external pressure on university members to supply for the needs of society—tensions which have been accompanying the academy ever since","PeriodicalId":311870,"journal":{"name":"Ecstasy in the Classroom","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecstasy in the Classroom","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5422/fordham/9780823281923.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Some theologians defined Paul's cognition during his trance as purely intellectual and unmatched by the same degree of love, contrasting it to another form of cognition, which engages the affective part of the soul. Chapter 6 examines this dichotomy, thereby examining the moral aspects of knowledge in scholastic society and thought. A comparative investigation of questions concerning the meritorious value of prophecy and other modes of knowledge reveals the formulation of a new concept of grace: grace of a type that does not make one worthy for salvation and may well reside in a sinner. The prominent examples of such grace were the pure intellectual talent of pagans or sinners and the charisma of gifted preachers. A dominant metaphor for sterile knowledge was of “remaining standing in the truth, without moving further to the good deed” (which is like knowing you must go the gym—but remaining on the sofa). These and related theoretical discussions lead to a discussion of charisma, ethic in the academic sphere, and the value of personal example in teaching within the newly-formed institution and to reflections about the internal search for truth and the external pressure on university members to supply for the needs of society—tensions which have been accompanying the academy ever since
知识本身能成为美德吗?
一些神学家将保罗在出神期间的认知定义为纯粹的智力,无法与同等程度的爱相媲美,并将其与另一种形式的认知进行了对比,后者涉及灵魂的情感部分。第六章考察了这种二分法,从而考察了学术社会和思想中知识的道德方面。对有关预言和其他知识模式的值得赞扬的价值的问题进行比较调查,揭示了恩典的新概念的形成:恩典的一种类型,不使一个值得救赎,可能很好地居住在一个罪人。这种恩典的突出例子是异教徒或罪人纯粹的智力才能和有天赋的传教士的魅力。关于无用知识的一个主要比喻是“坚持真理,不进一步做好事”(这就像知道你必须去健身房,但却呆在沙发上)。这些和相关的理论讨论导致了对学术领域的魅力、伦理和新成立的大学教学中的个人榜样价值的讨论,以及对大学内部对真理的追求和大学成员为满足社会需求而面临的外部压力的反思——从那时起,这种紧张关系一直伴随着学院
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信